From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF9607ED7A for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:53:37 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of gdsfh1@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.160.54; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gdsfh1@gmail.com"; x-sender="gdsfh1@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of gdsfh1@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.54 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.160.54; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gdsfh1@gmail.com"; x-sender="gdsfh1@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-pb0-f54.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.160.54; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gdsfh1@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-pb0-f54.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AioCAKLBXVDRVaA2k2dsb2JhbABFhgu4GAgjAQEBAQkJCwkUBCOCIAEBAQMBEgIPHQEbHgMBCwYFCwMMAiYCAiIBEQEFARwGNYdQAQMJBguaBwkDi1dPgnWEbwoZJw1ZiHQBAQQMgRWPE4ESA4hQjRWORBYphAo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,467,1344204000"; d="scan'208";a="156598972" Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com ([209.85.160.54]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 22 Sep 2012 15:53:36 +0200 Received: by pbbrp8 with SMTP id rp8so304925pbb.27 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 06:53:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=jsNpBhUgyMV+4XOuK9PCy8/JFDly8KhiTB+wOTUAIZ8=; b=0xJmaIWNbIeaU3jhj++snKfrHMhJO0+nSZvfQsyg+SPLHg8UYcs/RqlLcdXklRl0y9 qXtQMb/ZDE5GwF2fGaqpTQylzfBumViEBWPK5rJvQD/aanSTRTx+fjszGVnLmTr7vcba f8/BDwXhNEMXNs/kL6pdIkV0swsKC9fd/rLoOJRp+ehxr2Z1Ez7U43h+3I9AQMPTz/Dx XK8/Msn1vc3ekooHS7xBgxo+b6XEqQu61SG59Lj3g5dswTyeHu/u0zcO9ru/PgAbjDq5 apug652JYogPaZfqCaleRkIppo0ZyC1hJKQtjAbUtb2RCEP+Xuct2ZVdLKj91atFwInX NkVQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.240.7 with SMTP id vw7mr23106143pbc.152.1348322014894; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 06:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.16.73 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 06:53:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <505DBBB3.10105@inria.fr> References: <5050A32C.9090809@inria.fr> <20120917.222210.832076572642519350.Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be> <505C6EAF.5080301@inria.fr> <505DBBB3.10105@inria.fr> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:53:34 +0300 Message-ID: From: Dmitry Grebeniuk To: Romain Bardou Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Tuareg mode: Indentation of application arguments Hello. > that it will reindent stuff I have indented by hand to bypass some rules of > Tuareg I don't like. > I believe that good indentation rules should not rely on > automation to actually be usable. This is the common problem of all IDE's for OCaml I've tried, strangely. For example, TypeRex, good IDE, lacks an option to disable autoindentation, so I doubt whether I'll be fighting with autoindentation or will stop to use TypeRex at all in some near future. (of course I filed a github issue, it was 2 months ago, https://github.com/OCamlPro/typerex/issues/58 , still no reaction.) I don't want to learn elisp to fix this, too.