From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdsfh1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D13D7ED27
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Thu, 31 May 2012 15:21:38 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuoBANdvx0/RVaA2kGdsb2JhbABEhU6uNQgiAQEBAQkJDQcUBCOCGQEBBBICDx0BGx4DDAYFCwMMAiYCAiIBEQEFARwGGxqHWgEDC5pYCQOLUlCCcIRtChknDVeIcQEFDIEXjiKBEgOIOoxejhY+hAI
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,692,1330902000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="146042785"
Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com ([209.85.160.54])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 31 May 2012 15:21:37 +0200
Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so1874715pbb.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 31 May 2012 06:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=92eVuKfgeXrLtbli55noBnu59SgE+Y5lpmtt8UIhoHA=;
        b=rMpDrR77KVT8YTdHezWxu9RJS+VvUilsNxIX+lkQganXiEJShU0HtKnpQOn3E9glrT
         s8Hm4Tj03ZDQqLQPVLM4Fsf3ktYHBjMBCnEYmr4WpQRj5IszBTIMkWFLAlBWQwBKWa+t
         DiY4PP9crSlrOfNJx1OzgdeorNmYPWhsRhmA6FwD4RBmlk2dRKXtfKuw1SpCBJ8/ohJ0
         jaBDPkJGzYAspMqR7mEi1qwjW7aPckvMJ8vhPQnB1QhhvA2AU7hbaCt4TSaRrP5Jh8WW
         HAWFWk1X4irZvmZ8gvIi6hsU6AMhUJlYcMDvOlX0n+Y8C0qH6DyifbGHen+Gv00EZG8D
         JN+g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.136.106 with SMTP id pz10mr456780pbb.143.1338470495415;
 Thu, 31 May 2012 06:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.46.175 with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2012 06:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FC76B3E.2070509@frisch.fr>
References: <CAH2fdNZ+-COr_HWoD_q1JS2uV1syRfaXkncokrtdxD45qyZnCQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<jptm5g$bul$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<4FC61595.6070009@frisch.fr>
	<4FC62B53.20504@gmail.com>
	<4FC76B3E.2070509@frisch.fr>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 16:21:35 +0300
Message-ID: <CAPi0vKVivCUT7YKtca6W7HtXyTYOzsdQrKh6KpyXBuWiJUbjng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dmitry Grebeniuk <gdsfh1@gmail.com>
To: Alain Frisch <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Syntax extensions without Camlp4

Hello.

> =C2=A0- A different syntax (the revised one). =C2=A0I understand the bene=
fits of this
> new syntax, but it seems kind of crazy to have a "low-level" tool
> implemented in (and encouraging) a syntax different from the core system.

  But how will people otherwise discover the beauty of
revised syntax if camlp4 will accept original syntax?