From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247B3BC69 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:51:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l2UDp3PD031354 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:51:03 +0200 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id k3so890826ugf for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:51:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=dpzZC9U3boGY05GFW4+21l3aG/W6lDgGwbJ0/DueTbKH6/y0Ql52jYJZ7v4+5Jo8g32d7LGuB1/ol7oeevt4MivbeSdQvFb26QDqRPyx88d+qvclgAQhTNVAkGu2Mqw3cbBxTlURIXHXMuDpLSPDl/lmCfShdhsAQUGb3Y4dUs4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=ayt4tcxfHWsrHkUAvie4dnU+rOES0IJVPlpPHfAoJ7RSJ/HdjyBk0+9mkLB/4mO7wEjVK5MWvr3sHs0rLw6QCBKt//uDUwM3Kee8vgyLhENj3VOQTO5J9bc/JE7f0+8eZ/caTbQciHuyEAMSEvxIiuLFSnaSJlP3vkz5awuvo5Y= Received: by 10.82.152.16 with SMTP id z16mr3936049bud.1175262662471; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.34? ( [88.7.143.102]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z34sm1400602ikz.2007.03.30.06.51.00; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:51:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <51E5CF1F-352C-434A-8C5E-2AA4E52EE520@gmail.com> <20070330133151.GC6173@yquem.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: Francois.Pottier@inria.fr, "Caml List" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joel Reymont Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Size of produced parser: menhir vs ocamlyacc Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:51:00 +0100 To: "Markus Mottl" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 460D15C7.001 on concorde : j-chkmail score : XXX : 5/20 1 0.000 -> 3 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 460D15C7.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; parser:01 ocamlyacc:01 markus:01 mottl:01 ocamlyacc:01 parsers:01 2007,:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 complex:04 size:95 benchmarks:07 haven't:09 but:14 some:14 On Mar 30, 2007, at 2:45 PM, Markus Mottl wrote: > I also haven't done any serious benchmarks, but I remember seeing > menhir beat ocamlyacc on some of my parsers. How complex were they? -- http://wagerlabs.com/