From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36CF47EEAF
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:52:38 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhcBAPk7AVFKN1ZKm2dsb2JhbABEgziCM1q4GQ4BAQEBAQgJCwkUJ4IfAQUMF1YQCQIaAiYCAkcQBhuIEgSQEZp+kmiBI45FMmEDm2QTjVY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,529,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="191372370"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2013 14:52:37 +0100
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (23-234.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.234.23])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FFE20B80E1;
	Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:52:35 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:52:29 +0100
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: =?utf-8?Q?T=C3=B6r=C3=B6k_Edwin?= <edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <D0014890213D42FC959A1D86085A02EB@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <5101372E.8030900@etorok.net>
References: <24b397e9.3d7.13c6c7b5296.Coremail.syshen@nudt.edu.cn>
 <87boce7md8.fsf@li195-236.members.linode.com>
 <5101372E.8030900@etorok.net>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] :: how to locate the source of exception

Le jeudi, 24 janvier 2013 =C3=A0 14:29, T=C3=B6r=C3=B6k Edwin a =C3=A9crit :
> It works with native code too if you set Printexc.record_backtrace as wri=
tten above, but
> bytecode backtraces are usually more reliable (the native backtrace gets =
cut off sometimes,
> perhaps due to some 3rdparty libraries not being compiled with -g).

I think it's due to tail call optimisation.

Best,

Daniel