From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA03963; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:22:15 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA03858 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:22:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ext-nj2gw-3.online-age.net (ext-nj2gw-3.online-age.net [216.35.73.165]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g7FGMDv05571 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:22:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from int-nj2gw-4.online-age.net (int-nj2gw-4.online-age.net [3.159.236.68]) by ext-nj2gw-3.online-age.net (8.12.3/8.9.1/990426-RLH) with ESMTP id g7FGM8cP023689; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:22:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from uswaumsxb4medge.med.ge.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by int-nj2gw-4.online-age.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/990426-RLH) with ESMTP id g7FGM16g016484; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:22:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by USWAUMSXB4MEDGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id ; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:21:53 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Gurr, David (MED, self)" To: Vitaly Lugovsky , "Yurii A. Rashkovskii" Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Namespace proposal Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:21:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk My two cents worth: Please dont copy package ideas from languages that lack functors. And Java's package == directory idea is far from beloved by all. -D > -----Original Message----- > From: Vitaly Lugovsky [mailto:vsl@ontil.ihep.su] > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 8:53 AM > To: Yurii A. Rashkovskii > Cc: caml-list@inria.fr > Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Namespace proposal > > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Yurii A. Rashkovskii wrote: > > > Hi Vitaly! > > > > > I think that the best and the most natural solution is something > > > like Java or Python packages... > > > > Well, as it was proposed in original mail :) > > I mean slightly different approach: no need in any syntax sugar, but > only using the directory structure. It's much better then cifering > package contents and names inside Makefiles, and it does not need any > significiant modifications to the existing OCaml code. > > > > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners