From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BD5BBBB for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:37:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-white.research.att.com ([192.20.225.110]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k0NJbKlK008244 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:37:20 +0100 Received: from [172.24.78.42] (vpn-39.research.att.com [135.207.240.39]) by bigmail.research.att.com (8.13.3+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k0NJgoff008594; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:42:50 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: John Reppy Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kathleen Fisher Subject: Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:37:14 -0800 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 43D53070.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; reppy:01 ocaml:01 object-:01 summarize:01 long:05 oriented:05 fisher:05 fisher:05 john:08 i'm:08 real:09 research:11 doesn't:12 enough:13 responses:85 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS, MISSING_SUBJECT autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 As part of our work on Moby, John Reppy and I are collecting experiences people have had using the object-oriented features of Ocaml, as it has been available long enough for people to use it "for real." We are interested in understanding what people use the object- oriented features for. What works really well? What doesn't work so smoothly? How do you decide when to use the object-oriented features? Do you have other observations you'd like to share? I'm happy to summarize responses sent directly to me for the list. Thanks in advance! Kathleen Fisher