From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3274BC6C for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:50:07 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAA+3qkfAXQImh2dsb2JhbACQMQEBAQgKKZta X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,316,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="22361117" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2008 16:50:07 +0100 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m17Fo65M027587 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:50:07 +0100 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,316,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="22361116" Received: from macabane.inria.fr ([128.93.8.160]) by mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 07 Feb 2008 16:50:06 +0100 Message-Id: From: Damien Doligez To: Liste de diffusion OCaml In-Reply-To: <20080205081845.2D24D1C02531@mwinf2341.orange.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Variants & structural ordering Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:50:08 +0100 References: <20080205081845.2D24D1C02531@mwinf2341.orange.fr> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 47AB28AF.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; damien:01 damien:01 variants:01 guichard:01 doligez:01 doligez:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 structural:04 guess:04 comparison:05 inria:06 function:08 ace:90 ace:90 On 2008-02-05, at 09:21, Damien Guichard wrote: > The relation you wish is: > > Card(2) < ...< Card(10) < Jack < Queen < King < Ace That's funny, depending on the suit I would wish one of the following: Card(7) < ... < Card(9) < Jack < Queen < King < Card(10) < Ace Card(7) < Card(8) < Queen < King < Card(10) < Ace < Card(9) < Jack ... And no fixed comparison function will ever be able to guess whether you're comparing trumps. -- the other Damien