From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6CF57FC18 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 12:04:06 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of anil@recoil.org) identity=pra; client-ip=5.153.225.51; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="anil@recoil.org"; x-sender="anil@recoil.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of anil@recoil.org) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=5.153.225.51; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="anil@recoil.org"; x-sender="anil@recoil.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@bark.recoil.org) identity=helo; client-ip=5.153.225.51; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="anil@recoil.org"; x-sender="postmaster@bark.recoil.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ALBQBBzuFU/zPhmQVcgwbJWQqBDEMBAQEBAQF8hE0/gR4giEAEzQkLAQEBAQEcj3k3gmaBFAWYb5MNIoNugzIBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0ALBQBBzuFU/zPhmQVcgwbJWQqBDEMBAQEBAQF8hE0/gR4giEAEzQkLAQEBAQEcj3k3gmaBFAWYb5MNIoNugzIBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,587,1418079600"; d="scan'208";a="100202457" Received: from bark.recoil.org ([5.153.225.51]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 16 Feb 2015 12:04:05 +0100 Received: from flick.office (volstagg-0.srg.cl.cam.ac.uk [128.232.32.232]); by bark.recoil.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 09e1f232; TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:04:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Anil Madhavapeddy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:04:00 +0000 Message-Id: Cc: opam-devel To: Ocaml Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Subject: [Caml-list] OPAM: retiring 3.12.1 testing? Dear OCaml list, We are currently testing the following compiler versions on every pull requ= est to OPAM; - OCaml 3.12.1 - OCaml 4.00.1 - OCaml 4.01.0 - OCaml 4.02.0 We will shortly have to test 4.02.1, and would also like to test trunk snap= shots of the compiler as an "allowed failure". Running 6 compiler revisions per package puts quite a bit of stress on our = Travis CI resources, and so it's probably time to retire OCaml 3.12.1 from the testin= g matrix. Before we do this, I'd like to get a sense for how many people still care a= bout ensuring that their packages work well on the 3.12.1 series, or if there are still d= istributions for which this support matters. If there is still sufficient interest, we = can continue to support 3.12.1 for some time. thanks, Anil=