From: Ivan Gotovchits <ivg@ieee.org>
To: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
Cc: platform <platform@lists.ocaml.org>, OCaml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Package compilation and debug mode
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 15:16:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB87F68C-B1DC-4D70-BED9-1DD3D55A01E2@ieee.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30AF5A7CB977477A9BF094F3BC19C58C@erratique.ch>
It looks like, that currently the `-g` option has no performance cost at all (correct me if I’m wrong). Presumably, there is some increase in the package size, but who cares. With these premises, I think it would be a good policy to distribute packages with `-g` flag enabled.
> On Mar 12, 2016, at 4:35 PM, Daniel Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to know what the consensus is about distributing packages that always compile in debug mode. It seems that some persons do want to have debug always enabled [1,2], but the discussion is not clear cut [1].
>
> By default all my packages are released with -g disabled. It seems easy enough to have an opam switch (even the official one) that automatically enables the flag.
>
> So I think OCaml's opam repository should have a policy here. The answer should also take system package managers into account since those pull directly from the tarballs (if this document [3] is still in use for debian it seems they do require compilation with debug mode).
>
> Personally I don't have an opinion about it, I'm rather seeking an answer here.
>
> Best,
>
> Daniel
>
> [1] http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=6728
> [2] http://rgrinberg.com/blog/2016/02/26/opam-package-checklist/
> [3] http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.html/c305.html#AEN307
>
>
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-13 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-12 21:35 Daniel Bünzli
2016-03-13 19:16 ` Ivan Gotovchits [this message]
2016-03-14 7:19 ` Mark Shinwell
2016-03-14 8:14 ` whitequark
2016-03-14 8:24 ` Mark Shinwell
2016-03-23 9:43 ` Daniel Bünzli
2016-03-23 10:02 ` Thomas Gazagnaire
2016-03-23 10:12 ` [Caml-list] [ocaml-platform] " Gabriel Scherer
2016-03-23 10:23 ` [Caml-list] " Daniel Bünzli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DB87F68C-B1DC-4D70-BED9-1DD3D55A01E2@ieee.org \
--to=ivg@ieee.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch \
--cc=platform@lists.ocaml.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).