From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F12BC7F20B for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:07:56 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of anil@recoil.org) identity=pra; client-ip=89.16.177.154; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="anil@recoil.org"; x-sender="anil@recoil.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of anil@recoil.org) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=89.16.177.154; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="anil@recoil.org"; x-sender="anil@recoil.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@dark.recoil.org) identity=helo; client-ip=89.16.177.154; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="anil@recoil.org"; x-sender="postmaster@dark.recoil.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvwBALb6GFFZELGagWdsb2JhbABEri2TAQ4BARYmJ4IfAQEBAwEBAQFrCwULCxgNGgchBgEdAREGExKHbgMJCgi1bwMKiVuMP4RtYQOTcVqBWYEdiiOIGQ X-IPAS-Result: AvwBALb6GFFZELGagWdsb2JhbABEri2TAQ4BARYmJ4IfAQEBAwEBAQFrCwULCxgNGgchBgEdAREGExKHbgMJCgi1bwMKiVuMP4RtYQOTcVqBWYEdiiOIGQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,643,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="1803800" Received: from recoil.dh.bytemark.co.uk (HELO dark.recoil.org) ([89.16.177.154]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with SMTP; 11 Feb 2013 14:57:55 +0100 Received: (qmail 4547 invoked by uid 634); 11 Feb 2013 14:07:54 -0000 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Check-By: dark.recoil.org Received: from volstagg-0.srg.cl.cam.ac.uk (HELO [10.0.1.83]) (128.232.32.232) (smtp-auth username remote@recoil.org, mechanism cram-md5) by dark.recoil.org (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:07:54 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) From: Anil Madhavapeddy In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:07:52 +0000 Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Daniel_B=FCnzli?= , Thomas Gazagnaire , OCaml List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <92AE69ABC13D49FDAEF8612487219BE7@erratique.ch> <509A76BD-E8E1-41DF-8116-883B8F573E0E@ocamlpro.com> <0388897636364093A29775AA28F2740A@erratique.ch> <814C34F1-9A77-49F7-ACED-035067EFC429@ocamlpro.com> To: Gabriel Scherer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on dark.recoil.org Subject: Re: [Caml-list] opam http repo, archive downloading As Thomas noted, this list: http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/platform is available for OPAM-related questions that aren't appropriate for the tracker. We've got lots of developments planned for OPAM to better support the upcoming Platform, and that's the place to discuss broader issues. However, I'd suggest sticking to Github for feature requests that might be bugs, as it's easy to cross-reference them and keep track of what's going on. You should assume that mails to a list won't have anyone act on them, whereas issues always get a response. -anil On 11 Feb 2013, at 13:10, Gabriel Scherer wrote: > Unfortunately, that's the route most github projects take: you > interact with them through the issues tracker. > I regret the mailing-list with archives and well-understood process > (... and running on free software stacks), but the convenience for > developers to discuss design questions, comment on tentative commits > and hastily merge changes in a single unified clicky interface is > manifest. Before someone develops a Firefox,Chrome,whatever extension > doing "oh this looks like a commit URL let's add an option to find the > corresponding repo of mine and pull it there in one click", you're > going to have to adapt to the {github,bitbucket,gitorious,gitlab} > interfaces. >=20 > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Daniel B=FCnzli > wrote: >> Le lundi, 11 f=E9vrier 2013 =E0 12:47, Thomas Gazagnaire a =E9crit : >>> I'm not very fond of having hundreds of mailing-list, so I think that's= a good idea to use platform@list.ocaml.org (mailto:platform@list.ocaml.org= ) (which has been primary created for this purpose). >>=20 >> Ok. >>> You can also open issues on github, they are easily searchable. >>=20 >> Ok but there's a difference between an issue and a question in my opinio= n. A question may not necessarily be an issue with opam. Unless you specifi= cally want us to use the issue tracker for questions aswell. >>=20 >> Best, >>=20 >> Daniel >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> -- >> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: >> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list >> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners >> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >=20 > --=20 > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs