From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: weis
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA18619 for caml-redistribution; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 09:15:09 +0100 (MET)
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA09028 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:43:34 +0100 (MET)
Received: from heaton.cl.cam.ac.uk (heaton.cl.cam.ac.uk [128.232.32.11])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA20390
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:43:32 +0100 (MET)
Received: from britten.cl.cam.ac.uk (cl.cam.ac.uk) [128.232.33.49] (ptw20)
	by heaton.cl.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.82 #1)
	id 105Yzz-0007hg-00; Wed, 27 Jan 1999 17:43:31 +0000
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2+CL 2/24/98
To: caml-list@inria.fr
cc: Pawel.Wojciechowski@cl.cam.ac.uk
Subject: Hashtbl or ref Map?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 17:43:30 +0000
From: Pawel Wojciechowski <Pawel.Wojciechowski@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <E105Yzz-0007hg-00@heaton.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Sender: weis

I'd like to have a simple map (association table, not hashed) 
and share it between OCAML threads. Which module (from efficiency 
point-of-view) it would better to use for that purpose: Hashtbl 
or ref Map? 

Pawel

-- 
   ------------------------------------------------------------
      Pawel T Wojciechowski            cambridge university
      www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/ptw20         computer lab.