* [Caml-list] IDE
@ 2013-09-08 6:34 Suminda Dharmasena
2013-09-08 12:41 ` Kristopher Micinski
2013-09-08 16:56 ` Thomas Refis
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Suminda Dharmasena @ 2013-09-08 6:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 590 bytes --]
Hi,
Is it possible to have a Eclipse based IDE? Perhaps Xtext may help in
putting one together.
Suminda
--
Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena, B.Sc. Comp. & I.S. (Hon.) Lond.,
P.G.Dip. Ind. Maths. J'Pura, MIEEE, MACM, CEO Sakrīō! ▣ *Address*: 6G • 1st
Lane • Pagoda Road • Nugegoda 10250 • Sri Lanka. ▣ *Mobile*
: +94-(0)711007945 ▣ *Tele*: +94-(0)11-5 864614 / 5 875614 / 2 825908 ▣ *Web
*: http://www.sakrio.com ▣
This email is subjected to the email Terms of Use and Disclaimer:
http://www.sakrio.com/email-legal. Please read this first.
--
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2070 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] IDE
2013-09-08 6:34 [Caml-list] IDE Suminda Dharmasena
@ 2013-09-08 12:41 ` Kristopher Micinski
2013-09-08 12:43 ` Michael Hicks
` (2 more replies)
2013-09-08 16:56 ` Thomas Refis
1 sibling, 3 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Kristopher Micinski @ 2013-09-08 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suminda Dharmasena; +Cc: caml-list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1213 bytes --]
OcaIDE exists:
http://www.algo-prog.info/ocaide/
Along with others as well.
I've personally never been a real fan of using Eclipse for OCaml
development. I feel like the good reasons to use Eclipse are for languages
with huge overhead in naming conventions and boilerplate, Java being the
case in point example. By contrast, in OCaml most people use the module
system and I've usually been able to get by with swapping between a few
buffers of interface files. Of course, YMMV.
Kris
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Suminda Dharmasena <sirinath@sakrio.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to have a Eclipse based IDE? Perhaps Xtext may help in
> putting one together.
>
> Suminda
> --
> Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena, B.Sc. Comp. & I.S. (Hon.)
> Lond., P.G.Dip. Ind. Maths. J'Pura, MIEEE, MACM, CEO Sakrīō! ▣ *Address*:
> 6G • 1st Lane • Pagoda Road • Nugegoda 10250 • Sri Lanka. ▣ *Mobile*:
> +94-(0)711007945 ▣ *Tele*: +94-(0)11-5 864614 / 5 875614 / 2 825908 ▣ *Web
> *: http://www.sakrio.com ▣
>
> This email is subjected to the email Terms of Use and Disclaimer:
> http://www.sakrio.com/email-legal. Please read this first.
> --
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3202 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] IDE
2013-09-08 12:41 ` Kristopher Micinski
@ 2013-09-08 12:43 ` Michael Hicks
[not found] ` <1378644250512.324564603@boxbe>
2013-09-09 15:09 ` Jon Harrop
2 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Michael Hicks @ 2013-09-08 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kristopher Micinski; +Cc: Suminda Dharmasena, caml-list
UPenn uses OcaIDE for its introductory courses, and we've used it at UMD as well. I think it helps students make the transition from Java to OCaml with less pain, when they are used to developing the former in Eclipse. But I agree with you that Eclipse is a more obvious win for Java than OCaml.
-Mike
On Sep 8, 2013, at 8:41 AM, Kristopher Micinski <krismicinski@gmail.com> wrote:
> OcaIDE exists:
>
> http://www.algo-prog.info/ocaide/
>
> Along with others as well.
>
> I've personally never been a real fan of using Eclipse for OCaml development. I feel like the good reasons to use Eclipse are for languages with huge overhead in naming conventions and boilerplate, Java being the case in point example. By contrast, in OCaml most people use the module system and I've usually been able to get by with swapping between a few buffers of interface files. Of course, YMMV.
>
> Kris
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Suminda Dharmasena <sirinath@sakrio.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to have a Eclipse based IDE? Perhaps Xtext may help in putting one together.
>
> Suminda
> --
> Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena, B.Sc. Comp. & I.S. (Hon.) Lond., P.G.Dip. Ind. Maths. J'Pura, MIEEE, MACM, CEO Sakrīō! ▣ Address: 6G • 1st Lane • Pagoda Road • Nugegoda 10250 • Sri Lanka. ▣ Mobile: +94-(0)711007945 ▣ Tele: +94-(0)11-5 864614 / 5 875614 / 2 825908 ▣ Web: http://www.sakrio.com ▣
>
> This email is subjected to the email Terms of Use and Disclaimer: http://www.sakrio.com/email-legal. Please read this first.
> --
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] IDE
[not found] ` <1378644250512.324564603@boxbe>
@ 2013-09-08 16:06 ` Suminda Dharmasena
2013-09-08 16:24 ` Daniel Bünzli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Suminda Dharmasena @ 2013-09-08 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Hicks; +Cc: Kristopher Micinski, caml-list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 18 bytes --]
This looks dated.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 39 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] IDE
2013-09-08 16:06 ` Suminda Dharmasena
@ 2013-09-08 16:24 ` Daniel Bünzli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Bünzli @ 2013-09-08 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suminda Dharmasena; +Cc: Michael Hicks, Kristopher Micinski, caml-list
Le dimanche, 8 septembre 2013 à 17:06, Suminda Dharmasena a écrit :
> This looks dated.
Did you *try* it ? Doesn't mean it doesn't work, and well last commit was only 9 months ago.
In any case there is also this one http://ocamldt.free.fr/
Can't comment on either though, I'm on the same line as Kris here (recommend to use emacs or vim).
Best,
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] IDE
2013-09-08 6:34 [Caml-list] IDE Suminda Dharmasena
2013-09-08 12:41 ` Kristopher Micinski
@ 2013-09-08 16:56 ` Thomas Refis
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Refis @ 2013-09-08 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suminda Dharmasena; +Cc: caml users
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1053 bytes --]
Le 8 sept. 2013 07:35, "Suminda Dharmasena" <sirinath@sakrio.com> a écrit :
> Is it possible to have a Eclipse based IDE? Perhaps Xtext may help in
putting one together.
I have never wrote a plugin for eclipse, nor have I used eclipse much, but
I expect it shouldn't be too hard to write a small plugin which would then
call merlin [1] or ocp-index [2].
Of the two I suspect ocp-index might be the easiest to wrap (only a few
commands to wrap, compared to a full protocol for merlin), but if you're
looking for the whole eclipse experience (i.e. reporting of errors and
warning as you type, not just having completion available) merlin should be
your tool of choice, imho.
If you decide to go with merlin you'll find that the protocol is not
really documented at the moment, we (I am one of the developpers) are
working on that though, but you can always contact us (by mail or one the
bugtracker) if you have any question or request.
Thomas.
[1] https://github.com/def-lkb/merlin
[2] https://github.com/OCamlPro/ocp-index
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1327 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* RE: [Caml-list] IDE
2013-09-08 12:41 ` Kristopher Micinski
2013-09-08 12:43 ` Michael Hicks
[not found] ` <1378644250512.324564603@boxbe>
@ 2013-09-09 15:09 ` Jon Harrop
2013-09-09 16:52 ` Suminda Dharmasena
` (2 more replies)
2 siblings, 3 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jon Harrop @ 2013-09-09 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Kristopher Micinski', 'Suminda Dharmasena'; +Cc: caml-list
FWIW, Intellisense is an invaluable way to explore APIs when using F#. Coming back to OCaml now feels cumbersome. The development of GUI apps is perhaps the most extreme example: my productivity is maybe 100x higher with F# than OCaml solely because of Intellisense (nothing to do with GUI designer tools).
Cheers,
Jon.
From: caml-list-request@inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-request@inria.fr] On Behalf Of Kristopher Micinski
Sent: 08 September 2013 13:41
To: Suminda Dharmasena
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] IDE
OcaIDE exists:
http://www.algo-prog.info/ocaide/
Along with others as well.
I've personally never been a real fan of using Eclipse for OCaml development. I feel like the good reasons to use Eclipse are for languages with huge overhead in naming conventions and boilerplate, Java being the case in point example. By contrast, in OCaml most people use the module system and I've usually been able to get by with swapping between a few buffers of interface files. Of course, YMMV.
Kris
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Suminda Dharmasena <sirinath@sakrio.com> wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to have a Eclipse based IDE? Perhaps Xtext may help in putting one together.
Suminda
--
Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena, B.Sc. Comp. & I.S. (Hon.) Lond., P.G.Dip. Ind. Maths. J'Pura, MIEEE, MACM, CEO Sakrīō! ▣ Address: 6G • 1st Lane • Pagoda Road • Nugegoda 10250 • Sri Lanka. ▣ Mobile: +94-(0)711007945 ▣ Tele: +94-(0)11-5 864614 / 5 875614 / 2 825908 ▣ Web: http://www.sakrio.com ▣
This email is subjected to the email Terms of Use and Disclaimer: http://www.sakrio.com/email-legal. Please read this first.
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] IDE
2013-09-09 15:09 ` Jon Harrop
@ 2013-09-09 16:52 ` Suminda Dharmasena
2013-09-15 15:16 ` Hongbo Zhang
2013-09-15 20:22 ` Komtanoo Pinpimai
2 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Suminda Dharmasena @ 2013-09-09 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jon; +Cc: Kristopher Micinski, caml-list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2391 bytes --]
I would agree.
--
Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena, B.Sc. Comp. & I.S. (Hon.) Lond.,
P.G.Dip. Ind. Maths. J'Pura, MIEEE, MACM, CEO Sakrīō! ▣ *Address*: 6G • 1st
Lane • Pagoda Road • Nugegoda 10250 • Sri Lanka. ▣ *Mobile*
: +94-(0)711007945 ▣ *Tele*: +94-(0)11-5 864614 / 5 875614 / 2 825908 ▣ *Web
*: http://www.sakrio.com ▣
This email is subjected to the email Terms of Use and Disclaimer:
http://www.sakrio.com/email-legal. Please read this first.
--
On 9 September 2013 20:39, Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
>
> FWIW, Intellisense is an invaluable way to explore APIs when using F#.
> Coming back to OCaml now feels cumbersome. The development of GUI apps is
> perhaps the most extreme example: my productivity is maybe 100x higher with
> F# than OCaml solely because of Intellisense (nothing to do with GUI
> designer tools).
>
> Cheers,
> Jon.
>
> From: caml-list-request@inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-request@inria.fr] On
> Behalf Of Kristopher Micinski
> Sent: 08 September 2013 13:41
> To: Suminda Dharmasena
> Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] IDE
>
> OcaIDE exists:
>
> http://www.algo-prog.info/ocaide/
>
> Along with others as well.
>
> I've personally never been a real fan of using Eclipse for OCaml
> development. I feel like the good reasons to use Eclipse are for languages
> with huge overhead in naming conventions and boilerplate, Java being the
> case in point example. By contrast, in OCaml most people use the module
> system and I've usually been able to get by with swapping between a few
> buffers of interface files. Of course, YMMV.
>
> Kris
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Suminda Dharmasena <sirinath@sakrio.com>
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to have a Eclipse based IDE? Perhaps Xtext may help in
> putting one together.
>
> Suminda
>
> --
> Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena, B.Sc. Comp. & I.S. (Hon.)
> Lond., P.G.Dip. Ind. Maths. J'Pura, MIEEE, MACM, CEO Sakrīō! ▣ Address: 6G
> • 1st Lane • Pagoda Road • Nugegoda 10250 • Sri Lanka. ▣ Mobile:
> +94-(0)711007945 ▣ Tele: +94-(0)11-5 864614 / 5 875614 / 2 825908 ▣ Web:
> http://www.sakrio.com ▣
>
> This email is subjected to the email Terms of Use and Disclaimer:
> http://www.sakrio.com/email-legal. Please read this first.
> --
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4581 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] IDE
2013-09-09 15:09 ` Jon Harrop
2013-09-09 16:52 ` Suminda Dharmasena
@ 2013-09-15 15:16 ` Hongbo Zhang
2013-09-15 20:22 ` Komtanoo Pinpimai
2 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Hongbo Zhang @ 2013-09-15 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jon, Caml List
On 9/9/13 11:09 AM, Jon Harrop wrote:
>
> FWIW, Intellisense is an invaluable way to explore APIs when using F#. Coming back to OCaml now feels cumbersome. The development of GUI apps is perhaps the most extreme example: my productivity is maybe 100x higher with F# than OCaml solely because of Intellisense (nothing to do with GUI designer tools).
try utop, it's not as good as Visual studio, but it's very useful to
explore API.
Personally I used it a lot to explore the OCaml compiler's API, which is
quite helpful
>
> Cheers,
> Jon.
>
> From: caml-list-request@inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-request@inria.fr] On Behalf Of Kristopher Micinski
> Sent: 08 September 2013 13:41
> To: Suminda Dharmasena
> Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] IDE
>
> OcaIDE exists:
>
> http://www.algo-prog.info/ocaide/
>
> Along with others as well.
>
> I've personally never been a real fan of using Eclipse for OCaml development. I feel like the good reasons to use Eclipse are for languages with huge overhead in naming conventions and boilerplate, Java being the case in point example. By contrast, in OCaml most people use the module system and I've usually been able to get by with swapping between a few buffers of interface files. Of course, YMMV.
>
> Kris
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Suminda Dharmasena <sirinath@sakrio.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to have a Eclipse based IDE? Perhaps Xtext may help in putting one together.
>
> Suminda
>
> --
> Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena, B.Sc. Comp. & I.S. (Hon.) Lond., P.G.Dip. Ind. Maths. J'Pura, MIEEE, MACM, CEO Sakrīō! ▣ Address: 6G • 1st Lane • Pagoda Road • Nugegoda 10250 • Sri Lanka. ▣ Mobile: +94-(0)711007945 ▣ Tele: +94-(0)11-5 864614 / 5 875614 / 2 825908 ▣ Web: http://www.sakrio.com ▣
>
> This email is subjected to the email Terms of Use and Disclaimer: http://www.sakrio.com/email-legal. Please read this first.
> --
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] IDE
2013-09-09 15:09 ` Jon Harrop
2013-09-09 16:52 ` Suminda Dharmasena
2013-09-15 15:16 ` Hongbo Zhang
@ 2013-09-15 20:22 ` Komtanoo Pinpimai
2013-09-17 11:20 ` Jon Harrop
2 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Komtanoo Pinpimai @ 2013-09-15 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
this makes me want to try F# and Intellisense, but I switched from
windows to osx while ago.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
>
> FWIW, Intellisense is an invaluable way to explore APIs when using F#. Coming back to OCaml now feels cumbersome. The development of GUI apps is perhaps the most extreme example: my productivity is maybe 100x higher with F# than OCaml solely because of Intellisense (nothing to do with GUI designer tools).
>
> Cheers,
> Jon.
>
> From: caml-list-request@inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-request@inria.fr] On Behalf Of Kristopher Micinski
> Sent: 08 September 2013 13:41
> To: Suminda Dharmasena
> Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] IDE
>
> OcaIDE exists:
>
> http://www.algo-prog.info/ocaide/
>
> Along with others as well.
>
> I've personally never been a real fan of using Eclipse for OCaml development. I feel like the good reasons to use Eclipse are for languages with huge overhead in naming conventions and boilerplate, Java being the case in point example. By contrast, in OCaml most people use the module system and I've usually been able to get by with swapping between a few buffers of interface files. Of course, YMMV.
>
> Kris
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Suminda Dharmasena <sirinath@sakrio.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to have a Eclipse based IDE? Perhaps Xtext may help in putting one together.
>
> Suminda
>
> --
> Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena, B.Sc. Comp. & I.S. (Hon.) Lond., P.G.Dip. Ind. Maths. J'Pura, MIEEE, MACM, CEO Sakrīō! ▣ Address: 6G • 1st Lane • Pagoda Road • Nugegoda 10250 • Sri Lanka. ▣ Mobile: +94-(0)711007945 ▣ Tele: +94-(0)11-5 864614 / 5 875614 / 2 825908 ▣ Web: http://www.sakrio.com ▣
>
> This email is subjected to the email Terms of Use and Disclaimer: http://www.sakrio.com/email-legal. Please read this first.
> --
>
>
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
--
In accordance with U.S. Treasury regulations, if this message contains
advice concerning one or more Federal tax issues, it is not a formal
legal opinion and may not be used by any person for the avoidance of
Federal tax penalties.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* RE: [Caml-list] IDE
2013-09-15 20:22 ` Komtanoo Pinpimai
@ 2013-09-17 11:20 ` Jon Harrop
2013-09-17 14:42 ` Paolo Donadeo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jon Harrop @ 2013-09-17 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: romerun, caml-list
Xamarin Studio is good when it works.
Cheers,
Jon.
-----Original Message-----
From: caml-list-request@inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-request@inria.fr] On Behalf Of Komtanoo Pinpimai
Sent: 15 September 2013 21:23
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] IDE
this makes me want to try F# and Intellisense, but I switched from windows to osx while ago.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
>
> FWIW, Intellisense is an invaluable way to explore APIs when using F#. Coming back to OCaml now feels cumbersome. The development of GUI apps is perhaps the most extreme example: my productivity is maybe 100x higher with F# than OCaml solely because of Intellisense (nothing to do with GUI designer tools).
>
> Cheers,
> Jon.
>
> From: caml-list-request@inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-request@inria.fr]
> On Behalf Of Kristopher Micinski
> Sent: 08 September 2013 13:41
> To: Suminda Dharmasena
> Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] IDE
>
> OcaIDE exists:
>
> http://www.algo-prog.info/ocaide/
>
> Along with others as well.
>
> I've personally never been a real fan of using Eclipse for OCaml development. I feel like the good reasons to use Eclipse are for languages with huge overhead in naming conventions and boilerplate, Java being the case in point example. By contrast, in OCaml most people use the module system and I've usually been able to get by with swapping between a few buffers of interface files. Of course, YMMV.
>
> Kris
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Suminda Dharmasena <sirinath@sakrio.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to have a Eclipse based IDE? Perhaps Xtext may help in putting one together.
>
> Suminda
>
> --
> Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena, B.Sc. Comp. & I.S. (Hon.)
> Lond., P.G.Dip. Ind. Maths. J'Pura, MIEEE, MACM, CEO Sakrīō! ▣
> Address: 6G • 1st Lane • Pagoda Road • Nugegoda 10250 • Sri Lanka. ▣
> Mobile: +94-(0)711007945 ▣ Tele: +94-(0)11-5 864614 / 5 875614 / 2
> 825908 ▣ Web: http://www.sakrio.com ▣
>
> This email is subjected to the email Terms of Use and Disclaimer: http://www.sakrio.com/email-legal. Please read this first.
> --
>
>
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
--
In accordance with U.S. Treasury regulations, if this message contains advice concerning one or more Federal tax issues, it is not a formal legal opinion and may not be used by any person for the avoidance of Federal tax penalties.
--
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs=
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] IDE
2013-09-17 11:20 ` Jon Harrop
@ 2013-09-17 14:42 ` Paolo Donadeo
2013-09-17 20:36 ` Jon Harrop
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Donadeo @ 2013-09-17 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OCaml mailing list
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 53 bytes --]
Jon, can you explain the "when" part?
--
*Paolo*
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 168 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* RE: [Caml-list] IDE
2013-09-17 14:42 ` Paolo Donadeo
@ 2013-09-17 20:36 ` Jon Harrop
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jon Harrop @ 2013-09-17 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Paolo Donadeo', 'OCaml mailing list'
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 846 bytes --]
Sure. Although Xamarin have announced that they intend to support F# as a first-class language on their toolstack they are still relying on the community-driven fsharpbindings. Xamarin recently put out an autoupdate to Xamarin Studio and several people including myself noticed that it broke F# support. No more “jump to definition” and some flakey Intellisense. I think the fix went into fsharpbindings on Github but I’ve no idea how long it will take to filter back to me.
So it isn’t all plain sailing but it is very impressive, IMO.
Cheers,
Jon.
From: caml-list-request@inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-request@inria.fr] On Behalf Of Paolo Donadeo
Sent: 17 September 2013 15:42
To: OCaml mailing list
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] IDE
Jon, can you explain the "when" part?
--
Paolo
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4003 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-17 20:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-08 6:34 [Caml-list] IDE Suminda Dharmasena
2013-09-08 12:41 ` Kristopher Micinski
2013-09-08 12:43 ` Michael Hicks
[not found] ` <1378644250512.324564603@boxbe>
2013-09-08 16:06 ` Suminda Dharmasena
2013-09-08 16:24 ` Daniel Bünzli
2013-09-09 15:09 ` Jon Harrop
2013-09-09 16:52 ` Suminda Dharmasena
2013-09-15 15:16 ` Hongbo Zhang
2013-09-15 20:22 ` Komtanoo Pinpimai
2013-09-17 11:20 ` Jon Harrop
2013-09-17 14:42 ` Paolo Donadeo
2013-09-17 20:36 ` Jon Harrop
2013-09-08 16:56 ` Thomas Refis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).