From: Keith Wansbrough <Keith.Wansbrough@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Documentation error - #myvariant
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:18:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1BJ9Z8-0005Rl-00@mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
Hi.. the OCaml documentation, section 4.2 on polymorphic variants,
Advanced use, explains that
To make this even more confortable, you may use type definitions as
abbreviations for or-patterns. That is, if you have defined type
myvariant = [`Tag1 int | `Tag2 bool], then the pattern #myvariant is
equivalent to writing (`Tag1(_ : int) | `Tag2(_ : bool)).
But this is not correct! Consider
type de = [`D | `E of de];;
type def = [`D | `E of def | `F of def];;
let rec deproc2 rfun =
function
| `D -> print_string "D"; `D
| `E(x) -> print_string "E"; `E(rfun x)
let rec deproc3 x = deproc2 deproc3 x
let rec defproc2 rfun =
function
(* | (`D | `E(_)) as x -> deproc2 rfun x *)
| #de as x -> deproc2 rfun x
| `F(x) -> print_string "f"; `F(rfun x)
let rec defproc3 : def -> def =
fun x -> defproc2 defproc3 x
This gives the following error (in OCaml 3.07+2):
File "polyvar2.ml", line 19, characters 29-30:
This expression has type def = [ `D | `E of def | `F of def ]
but is here used with type [< `D | `E of de | `F of de ]
Type def = [ `D | `E of def | `F of def ] is not compatible with type
de = [ `D | `E of de ]
(Note that the expression mentioned is the final x on the last line.)
Replacing the #de line with the commented line above it, however,
yields
val defproc3 : def -> def = <fun>
as expected. It looks to me like #de means (`D | `E(_:de)), rather
than (`D | `E(_)) as I expected; except that I'm not even sure what
`E(_:de) means in this case - does it do type-directed matching at
runtime?
Could the documentation please be made more accurate at this point?
Thanks.
--KW 8-)
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next reply other threads:[~2004-04-29 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-29 11:18 Keith Wansbrough [this message]
2004-04-29 12:40 ` Remi Vanicat
2004-04-29 13:54 ` Keith Wansbrough
2004-04-29 18:09 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1BJ9Z8-0005Rl-00@mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk \
--to=keith.wansbrough@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).