From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0FABC69 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 09:11:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail14.bluewin.ch (mail14.bluewin.ch [195.186.19.62]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l4V7BYY7026027 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 09:11:34 +0200 Received: from [10.0.1.2] (85.2.70.49) by mail14.bluewin.ch (Bluewin 7.3.121) id 46499DA20037B6DE; Thu, 31 May 2007 07:11:33 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5195a210705302250u6a9e5adey4ed857480f9e5cd8@mail.gmail.com> References: <5195a210705302250u6a9e5adey4ed857480f9e5cd8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_B=FCnzli?= Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:11:56 +0200 To: Yuanchen Zhu X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 465E7526.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bunzli:01 buenzli:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 numerically:01 50,:98 caml-list:01 loops:02 caml:02 caml:02 epfl:02 numerical:03 zhu:04 comparison:04 daniel:04 Le 31 mai 07 =E0 07:50, Yuanchen Zhu a =E9crit : > So the moral of the story: To use Ocaml for numerically intensive > work, code in C style in the inner loops. Look here http://caml.inria.fr/pub/old_caml_site/ocaml/numerical.html =20= for an explanation. Daniel