From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8CEE7FA4D for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 11:31:12 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of dra-news@metastack.com) identity=pra; client-ip=62.13.148.112; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="dra-news@metastack.com"; x-sender="dra-news@metastack.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of dra-news@metastack.com designates 62.13.148.112 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=62.13.148.112; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="dra-news@metastack.com"; x-sender="dra-news@metastack.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@outmail148112.authsmtp.co.uk) identity=helo; client-ip=62.13.148.112; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="dra-news@metastack.com"; x-sender="postmaster@outmail148112.authsmtp.co.uk"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYCALOu3FM+DZRwnGdsb2JhbABagmqwIQalCAGBBBYQAQEBAQEICwkJFCmEBAEEATo/BQsCAQg2EDIlAgQOiD8JA8Z4F4V8iR0zB4MvgRwFtDE X-IPAS-Result: AgYCALOu3FM+DZRwnGdsb2JhbABagmqwIQalCAGBBBYQAQEBAQEICwkJFCmEBAEEATo/BQsCAQg2EDIlAgQOiD8JA8Z4F4V8iR0zB4MvgRwFtDE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,785,1400018400"; d="scan'208";a="73746793" Received: from outmail148112.authsmtp.co.uk ([62.13.148.112]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2014 11:31:12 +0200 Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235]) by punt17.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s729V5Cv043073; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 10:31:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from romulus.metastack.com (cpc1-cmbg5-0-0-cust241.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.98.252.242]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s729V3qe040054; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 10:31:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from remus.metastack.local (remus.metastack.com [172.16.0.1]) by romulus.metastack.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s729V2EX020588 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 2 Aug 2014 10:31:02 +0100 Received: from Remus.metastack.local ([fe80::547c:3c42:e1da:eda2]) by Remus.metastack.local ([fe80::547c:3c42:e1da:eda2%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 10:31:02 +0100 From: David Allsopp To: "Richard W.M. Jones" CC: "caml-list@inria.fr" Thread-Topic: [Caml-list] OCaml 4.02 & {| in comments Thread-Index: AQHPrjNoW71ioNZR8k+cVomrvJa0LZu9DIt6 Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 09:31:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20140802092302.GA21347@annexia.org> In-Reply-To: <20140802092302.GA21347@annexia.org> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-GB X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: MetaStack Solutions Ltd. X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.65 on 172.16.0.20 X-Server-Quench: b8e0aeed-1a27-11e4-b396-002590a15da7 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd1ZAARAlZZVg1f DC4bFwdFRBksPQFF ChxFJgxfNl8UURhQ KkJXbgASJgVGAnhE VHkJW1VQQFxxU2B0 YQpSIw1cfENGQQdv UlZLRlBNFgB3AVJC ARwXNBozIgVCeH51 YQhhXHNTEhZyIEYs FxsACGxXZ2B9aWFK VF0KdApSbQNKfBpM agF+USdcZitlM3Bw LCQ6OjR0OTRENBEd ZSoEKFZaHQBTRHZy DwNWETgrHEhTU20y KVQtLVsZEUANKS0A X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633634383431.1023:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 81.98.252.242/25 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml 4.02 & {| in comments > Today I was reading about the new ppx extensions, and now I understand > that {| is the syntax used for quoted strings. Puzzle solved! >=20 > However my question is: Is it a bug that the compiler complains about > {| inside a comment? It'll be for the same reason as parentheses and quote marks must already ma= tch... it allows for nested (* ... *) unlike /* ... */ in C. David=