From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA23435; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:22:18 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA23616 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:22:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mwinf0603.wanadoo.fr (smtp3.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.25]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h5AEMGT22564 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:22:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from wanadoo.fr (unknown [81.48.55.112]) by mwinf0603.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F41F924000E5 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:22:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:22:15 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: [Caml-list] camlp4 From: Pierre CHATEL To: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Spam: no; 0.00; pierre:01 camlp:01 newbie:01 scheme's:01 ocaml:01 preprocessor:02 comparison:02 macros:03 scheme:03 wondering:04 generally:05 i'm:07 something:09 U6:88 sense:12 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hello, i'm kinda new to the list, so i hope my newbie questions will not disturb everyone :)) So, i was wondering if there were something like Scheme's hygienic macros with the Camlp4 preprocessor, or even if it does make sense with it. More generally, i'm looking for some good point-to-point comparison between OCaml and Scheme on the macro side...if u know some good ressource on that, please point it to me ! Thanks, Pierre CHATEL ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners