From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q28JBDjT001233
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 20:11:13 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkwHAG0DWU9KN1ZKlWdsb2JhbABDhF9WrmEEA4EtAQEBAQkLCQkSKYIKAQEEAQwXVgULCQIaAhgOAgI9ChAGG4d9BQSoKZIvgS+OETNjBJsXjSo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,552,1325458800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="148310743"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2012 20:11:07 +0100
Received: from heyho.local (53-234.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.234.53])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6202726ECEF8;
	Thu,  8 Mar 2012 13:11:05 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 20:11:02 +0100
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9mie_Dimino?= <jeremie@dimino.org>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <F0EFB44B8336483A96DAA7FAAED5B14F@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20120308175801.54ca2421@caladan.esterel-technologies.com>
References: <1991A512A37E49ACA5AAD30A38D628BF@erratique.ch>
 <20120308170947.4847d3b3@caladan.esterel-technologies.com>
 <2BC2638DE3FA453FA8895253AAD1F32C@erratique.ch>
 <20120308175801.54ca2421@caladan.esterel-technologies.com>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.5 (build 1043.1)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by walapai.inria.fr id q28JBDjT001233
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] oasis packaging questions



Le jeudi, 8 mars 2012 à 17:58, Jérémie Dimino a écrit :

> This may happen if you are using a subset of a multi-modules library
> which use a single-module one.

Not completely unlikely I agree.  

I'll go with the cma then.

Thanks,

Daniel