From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28C567F8FC for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 13:26:11 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AowEAKG7iVNKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABYhXyBIb9eAYEcDgEBAQEBBg0JCRQogiYBBSNWEAsODAImAgJHEAYbiDoEsTekcReBKo0oB4J1NoEVAQOgVhePeg X-IPAS-Result: AowEAKG7iVNKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABYhXyBIb9eAYEcDgEBAQEBBg0JCRQogiYBBSNWEAsODAImAgJHEAYbiDoEsTekcReBKo0oB4J1NoEVAQOgVhePeg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,946,1392159600"; d="scan'208";a="77248982" Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 31 May 2014 13:26:10 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.42] (147-116.61-188.cust.bluewin.ch [188.61.116.147]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4D2207CF8E; Sat, 31 May 2014 11:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 13:26:04 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= To: Florian Weimer Cc: Philippe Veber , Ben Millwood , Romain Bardou , caml users Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8738frjg8u.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <53835610.9050609@inria.fr> <53B801AD6F5B4BFBA0DA2A69D8775497@erratique.ch> <8738frjg8u.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Uncaught exceptions in function type. Le vendredi, 30 mai 2014 =C3=A0 20:03, Florian Weimer a =C3=A9crit : > * Daniel B=C3=BCnzli: >=20=20 > > * Non-exceptional errors, errors that the programmer will have to > > handle (e.g. failing to connect a socket), for that do not use a > > custom exception but use variants or options types. >=20=20 > In some cases this introduces allocations even for the success case, > and exception-based design avoids that. Exception handlers have their cost too. Daniel =20=20