From: Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@inria.fr>
To: Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@yahoo.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Purity and lazyness
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:07:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F7DFCC69-CCE2-4CBE-B28C-E2F9F9A33911@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <699537.6718.qm@web111509.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
On 2011-01-07, at 16:35, Dario Teixeira wrote:
> So, my question is whether there is something I'm missing and in fact "purity
> <=> lazyness", or I am reading too much from those Haskeller presentations,
> because they never meant to say anything beyond "lazyness => purity", and
> freely mixing the two was just a casual oversight.
For an example of a pure non-lazy language, have a look at Erlang.
-- Damien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-07 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-07 15:35 Dario Teixeira
2011-01-07 16:07 ` Damien Doligez [this message]
2011-01-07 16:38 ` David Rajchenbach-Teller
2011-01-07 18:16 ` Holger Weiß
2011-01-07 20:22 ` Eray Ozkural
2011-01-07 20:29 ` orbitz
2011-01-07 20:30 ` Joel Reymont
2011-01-07 20:33 ` Eray Ozkural
2011-01-08 9:44 ` Jesper Louis Andersen
2011-01-07 17:21 ` Alain Frisch
2011-01-07 17:46 ` Christophe Raffalli
2011-01-07 18:11 ` Holger Weiß
2011-01-07 18:52 ` Brian Hurt
2011-01-07 19:32 ` Petter Urkedal
2011-01-07 20:25 ` Eray Ozkural
2011-01-09 16:11 ` Jon Harrop
2011-01-10 6:27 ` Eray Ozkural
2011-01-07 19:17 ` Florian Weimer
[not found] ` <AANLkTikxCSQ+0XkOmSVDb3EWq_2oQ0pac3bDgc7f7jq+@mail.gmail.com>
2011-01-07 20:52 ` bluestorm
2011-01-09 16:15 ` Jon Harrop
2011-01-08 0:26 ` Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva
2011-01-08 9:28 ` Christophe Raffalli
2011-01-08 22:47 ` Florian Weimer
2011-01-09 10:00 ` Petter Urkedal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F7DFCC69-CCE2-4CBE-B28C-E2F9F9A33911@inria.fr \
--to=damien.doligez@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=darioteixeira@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).