From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <warrensomebody@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,
	SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BD8BC58
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:15:29 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvMBAMOtkkrRVdisimdsb2JhbACRW4huPwEBAQgLDAcRBas7gSOOeQEDAgSEFgU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,267,1249250400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="31592709"
Received: from mail-px0-f172.google.com ([209.85.216.172])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Aug 2009 00:15:28 +0200
Received: by pxi2 with SMTP id 2so3040163pxi.0
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version
         :subject:date:references:x-mailer;
        bh=dctl7AKUoZybWjMZ3Zuh/kiTYVXtFt7iH0zKcVhKTBQ=;
        b=IUlSeX4/1FDXJSyWLZsJLcE0GvuuKQjax3/e6HVL5rDKP04WsJP2Z/5OPd/+MM2ACq
         oh4k/jKvcPZFsErWWqe/mqMOkbBuNERCYiwauU2fSgf1EK6AU5/3I2JzyeEUknatAH82
         PWApwxoLQdyyRLKFyiRv93rVDR55UnQpJNUCg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references
         :x-mailer;
        b=Wf3WtEaNNzE1YMmFDVy77/QN/+pho+wcKCnweYkhHLkdvbFeX/P1lR/KOXqn/d/TlE
         CsoAFG+BR175MwK4yExyj2657AkQQ3LQrDW8JezX4RZCVB+a9+QPukWIQ7YJZ2JpTIT7
         HDIKx64wISupcky8IhckutMNuXoFHd39C9ZR0=
Received: by 10.115.65.11 with SMTP id s11mr6697068wak.170.1251152127436;
        Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from timesink.corp.631h.metaweb.com (nat07.metaweb.com [208.68.111.134])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k21sm114824waf.24.2009.08.24.15.15.25
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: OCaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Message-Id: <F950E129-5A1A-46A1-A85C-90A8CCAE03A5@gmail.com>
From: Warren Harris <warrensomebody@gmail.com>
To: Jake Donham <jake@donham.org>
In-Reply-To: <c7e4e9f0908241504m51d796b2wa49f0b0df84f603d@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] lazy vs fun
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:15:24 -0700
References: <94AD5806-B6F6-44F7-AA3C-1E63B6C1A722@metaweb.com> <c7e4e9f0908241504m51d796b2wa49f0b0df84f603d@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
X-Spam: no; 0.00; memoize:01 warren:98 warren:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 lazy:02 lazy:02 guess:04 manual:06 cells:08 overlooked:08 fun:08 aug:10 defer:15 thanks:17 


On Aug 24, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Jake Donham wrote:

>
> Lazy cells don't just defer, they also memoize the returned value once
> the cell is forced.

Thanks Jake - I guess I overlooked that in the manual.

Warren