From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B56BC6B for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:09:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l2RF9Cb4015011 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:09:13 +0200 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id k3so1979887ugf for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:09:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=mZAsvMBflqQRygfv3Ws2oBPdfoYsjeH9uICESg0JPTeSNBuufZ3bBK8UMdQ2DIhAjnfEYVXkigo8n10uSUhjISwz5eLYJn2se3yWiKlMzlkTqCksjHJlPEZ+S7QrIS3yKsIptoNp0bBD8GJD+ud7eIBDV+wRfGPffDdjzW8daWU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=NqJyH1zznmIAIsHVuqclppv7HKrlBi7LVQgJXr34M5hvXhKttSisYw+WymWKGC/2NOTyuvQjJvxkGqBeDbcPL7EkcOwDwsRLXC7OuuKB7VclL/w4dmbqnDrtZjG5y3CaMcwVpQ33qSY7/bHbfO2EskdKok5rqQds00M/1PBD5tQ= Received: by 10.66.243.4 with SMTP id q4mr1110653ugh.1175008152675; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.34? ( [88.7.141.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q1sm9347922uge.2007.03.27.08.09.11; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:09:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20070327150202.GB8071@yquem.inria.fr> References: <90F94C8E-77D4-4A5D-943E-44F964194E39@gmail.com> <20070327145149.GA8071@yquem.inria.fr> <58E2763F-9183-46D6-B50B-57B907093198@gmail.com> <20070327150202.GB8071@yquem.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: Caml List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joel Reymont Subject: Re: [Caml-list] JoCaml Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:09:20 +0100 To: luc.maranget@inria.fr (Luc Maranget) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 46093398.002 on discorde : j-chkmail score : XXX : 5/20 1 0.000 -> 3 X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 46093398.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; jocaml:01 maranget:01 syntax:01 ocaml:01 jocaml:01 translated:01 ocaml:01 2007,:98 luc:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 binary:01 mean:08 hum:08 removing:09 On Mar 27, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Luc Maranget wrote: > * Different syntax and no more code mobility. What was the reason for removing code mobility? > * Hopefully, binary compatibility with OCaml (Hum..) What does this mean? I was under the impression that Jocaml translated into OCaml. Also, will there be compatibility with latest OCaml releases going forward? My understanding is that the previous Jocaml was based on Ocaml 1.x. Thanks, Joel -- http://wagerlabs.com/