From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B982BC69 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:11:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5PKBche024846 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:11:38 +0200 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id p27so1263232ugc for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:11:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=l5aCihtLgjshqey57Fu0xdPz2auMF+dRIe65S8H1w7wk7+3cr/CH63Zr3XbYzw+71jCSUcw9ySmmRfNTcQ2GDlBNjFOZWBtokJXvqi2cmxS0tOhXwLnvrJZH5SewhicKB4X+2aiuXwXPMqUWY8Axd+4Boi/WzfjvxoOMI7XPm5M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=azNJNzS9/tfISIIlIoKovAalvOwBofoTOzBl7BgoEBZTshGP/pYNpTRgXhihjGaaOcxBdxOE3bjGw3qLcZkXRX6a5WCEmJWg+XgQgp+UruswTkxprRdAVGQdoA2UvGoqcaVFbln/E1FRILFannv2fKtwwuGydieel0lVNnJC5lU= Received: by 10.66.244.12 with SMTP id r12mr5353524ugh.1182802298055; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.35? ( [81.32.170.32]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i39sm2957955ugd.2007.06.25.13.11.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <200706251707.25356.jon@ffconsultancy.com> References: <200706251622.21625.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <3C66712F-1267-42A5-9D08-BBB9D5D579B1@gmail.com> <200706251707.25356.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joel Reymont Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Function inlining and functor Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:11:34 +0100 To: Caml List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 4680217A.000 on discorde : j-chkmail score : XXX : 5/20 1 0.000 -> 3 X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 4680217A.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; inlining:01 functor:01 metaocaml:01 ocaml:01 metaocaml:01 jocaml:01 compiler:01 2007,:98 blog:98 cvs:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 tree:02 mainstream:06 mainstream:06 On Jun 25, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Jon Harrop wrote: > MetaOCaml rocks. I do hope it becomes mainstream... :-) I wonder what kind of process is used to decide what becomes mainstream (part of the OCaml distribution?) and what doesn't. I suppose that keeping up CVS tree containing, say, MetaOCaml and JoCaml would quickly get tedious. I may be mistaken, though. -- http://topdog.cc - EasyLanguage to C# compiler http://wagerlabs.com - Blog