From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04499BBAF for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:10:28 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq0BAFNjt0lKfU4bk2dsb2JhbACUcD8BAQEBCQkKCREDqmiBBo9zAQMBA4QKBoMj X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,343,1233529200"; d="scan'208";a="22390119" Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.27]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2009 15:10:27 +0100 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so3507eyd.15 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:10:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date :x-mailer; bh=iqC48L5N1aGWSXXo9cpAStuJtUV9xQgFmzrSRo3VNOM=; b=Vao3eu2Ra/jpQKu8WCdiQ6buAeHQlB19oDR+A6SHr081/5efaPESe8lCYj2W/2NHJc g/4yWobZzX3Ov13LZZC2JoNE4PPlkGKwRat+6I5K2kAgSaTXJJakk/40YMP/xyCBF7xg dF1F/xDxpGMZinmk1CjFcnsoHQ/3P1KLRNveM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=DOw+9WqSUSotl67sYAUiNhM74iZsHBlDtLykSAVFPsRIXkL7ou92t4kgLCHYyhDrQQ h3+kp6GDmo/2AMegVJ3OZ770o/rZZu1P1fKvnrfPWgKZFazgjRBp1HGTI5yjLFEPk+gz x2Pcodl20K1A6FAO6kixHkBhX2obMQ7jhf/aM= Received: by 10.216.53.83 with SMTP id f61mr367420wec.33.1236780627451; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.10.30.7? (133.Red-88-1-80.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [88.1.80.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm6588695eyd.43.2009.03.11.07.10.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Joel Reymont To: O'Caml Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: ocaml resurgence? Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:10:24 +0000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 camlp:01 haskell:01 ideally:01 balanced:04 long:06 i'm:09 consider:09 things:13 but:14 used:16 ---:17 since:17 response:81 Is it just me or there's a fresh uptake of OCaml among bright people? I used to have to wait a long time (hours?) to get my questions answered and now I get them answered in just a few minutes. And I'm not talking simple questions since I don't consider camlp4 anywhere simple. Woot! I believe things are ideally balanced at the moment: response is prompt but the list traffic is not as high as for Haskell. --- http://tinyco.de Mac, C++, OCaml