From: "Mattias Waldau" <mattias.waldau@tacton.se>
To: <Pierre.Weis@inria.fr>,
"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+lists.caml/news/@RUM.cs.yale.edu>
Cc: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: RE: Functions must be explicitly typed, (was Same label in different types, how do people solve this?)
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:39:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <HDEEKOMJILGEIHIMAPCDCEBJDMAA.mattias.waldau@tacton.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200012151247.NAA30942@pauillac.inria.fr>
>>> >>>>> "Mattias" == Mattias Waldau <mattias.waldau@abc.se> writes:
>>> > I don't really see the use of infering types for functions. It works
for one
I was wrong! It is very nice to have type inference for local and anynomous
functions.
>>
>> I would like to note that type inference (i.e. code without
>> annotations) helps a lot when developing programs: the annotation free
>> code is not only easier to write but also easier to maintain since it
>> is kind of ``auto-adaptative'' and resistant to reorganisations and
>> names modifications.
If this were important, we shouldn't have different operators for * and *.
I had to change a program from integers to float recently, and it isn't fun
at all.
/mattias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-15 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-06 21:22 Same label in different types, how do people solve this? Mattias Waldau
2000-12-07 16:49 ` John Max Skaller
2000-12-07 18:34 ` Maxence Guesdon
2000-12-07 23:02 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2000-12-08 1:22 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-12-08 9:31 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-12-08 9:36 ` Pierre Weis
2000-12-08 9:48 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-12-08 18:41 ` John Max Skaller
2000-12-08 9:40 ` Nicolas barnier
2000-12-08 16:36 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-12-11 17:19 ` Pierre Weis
2000-12-10 12:49 ` Mattias Waldau
2000-12-11 18:23 ` Chris Hecker
2000-12-11 19:17 ` Pierre Weis
2000-12-12 10:02 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-12-12 3:25 ` Chet Murthy
2000-12-12 17:43 ` John Max Skaller
2000-12-12 19:24 ` Functions must be explicitly typed, (was Same label in different types, how do people solve this?) Mattias Waldau
2000-12-13 0:51 ` John Max Skaller
2000-12-15 10:13 ` Andreas Rossberg
2000-12-15 12:50 ` Frank Atanassow
2000-12-14 18:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2000-12-15 12:47 ` Pierre Weis
2000-12-15 13:39 ` Mattias Waldau [this message]
2000-12-15 23:37 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-12-16 14:10 ` ROverloading John Max Skaller
2000-12-15 21:51 ` Same label in different types, how do people solve this? Bruce Hoult
2000-12-12 17:19 ` John Max Skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=HDEEKOMJILGEIHIMAPCDCEBJDMAA.mattias.waldau@tacton.se \
--to=mattias.waldau@tacton.se \
--cc=Pierre.Weis@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=monnier+lists.caml/news/@RUM.cs.yale.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).