From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A319BC75 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:16:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j1O8GppV009020 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:16:51 +0100 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA30856 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:16:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.libertysurf.net (webmail-out.tiscali.fr [213.36.80.105]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j1O8GpmZ009016 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:16:51 +0100 Received: from tiscali.fr (192.168.10.56) by mail.libertysurf.net (7.1.026) id 41A46CD00031BB18 for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:16:51 +0100 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:16:50 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?tuareg,_windows,_cygwin_and_startxwin.bat?= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sensitivity: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?matthieu.dubuget@libertysurf.fr?=" To: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?caml-list?=" X-XaM3-API-Version: 3.2 R18 (B34 pl1) X-type: 0 X-SenderIP: 81.50.163.127 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 421D8D73.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 421D8D73.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; tuareg:01 matthieu:01 dubuget:01 matthieu:01 dubuget:01 ocaml:01 emacs:01 toplevel:01 emacs:01 toplevel:01 toplevels:01 buffer:01 ...:98 customized:98 cygwin:01 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: Hello.=0D=0A=0D=0AI use Ocaml (MSVC version) on windows XP Pro.=0D=0AI ex= perienced a strange behaviour of tuareg's=0D=0Atuareg-run-ocaml command, = depending on the way I call cygwin=0D=0Aand emacs. If anybody knows the r= eason of this behaviour, I=0D=0Awould be interested for an explanation.=0D= =0A=0D=0AWhen I call a toplevel this way, everything works ok :=0D=0A- ru= n cygwin=0D=0A- startx =0D=0A- run emacs from xterm=0D=0A- launch topleve= l with the tuareg-run-caml command=0D=0A=0D=0AWhen I work this way (I pre= fer this way, because it is=0D=0Asimpler, and do not leave an unused open= ed cygwin terminal):=0D=0A- run xwindows directly with startxwin.bat scri= pt=0D=0A- run emacs from xterm=0D=0A- launch toplevel with the tuareg-run= -caml command=0D=0A=0D=0A -> the toplevels runs in a separate windows = which is=0D=0Aannoying, because I then lack the power of emacs...=0D=0A=0D= =0A- If I launch a customized toplevel of mine, it runs as=0D=0Ausual ins= ide the *caml-toplevel* buffer=0D=0A=0D=0AAny idea ?=0D=0A=0D=0AThanks in= advance=0D=0A=0D=0AMatthieu=0A************************ ADSL JUSQU'A 8 ME= GA + 3 MOIS DE TELEPHONE GRATUIT ************************=0AL'ultra haut = d=E9bit =E0 15EUR/mois seulement ! Et vous t=E9l=E9phonez gratuitement en= France vers les postes fixes,=0Ahors num=E9ros sp=E9ciaux pendant 3 mois= .=0APour profiter de cette offre exceptionnelle, cliquez ici : http://reg= ister.tiscali.fr/adsl/ (voir conditions sur le site)=0A