From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA20619; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:22:48 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA20650 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:22:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA19808 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:49:34 +0100 (MET) Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com (e31.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.129]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gBJLnWn20485 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:49:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from westrelay04.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.193.32]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gBJLnVR7058246 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:49:31 -0500 Received: from d01ml064.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by westrelay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.3/NCO/VER6.4) with ESMTP id gBJLqo3h211634 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:52:51 -0700 Importance: Normal Subject: [Caml-list] mlgtk To: caml-list@inria.fr X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.5 September 22, 2000 Message-ID: From: "SONGSU YUN" Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:52:53 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML064/01/M/IBM(Release 5.0.11 +SPRs MIAS5EXFG4, MIAS5AUFPV and DHAG4Y6R7W, MATTEST |November 8th, 2002) at 12/19/2002 04:49:29 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi I recently started using OCAML and so far I like it, I think it deserves more attention than what it is getting now. I have a question about mlgtk. First, it seems that there's no more development activities going on. Is that the case ? I prefer mlgtk to lablgtk since it is easier to use, easier to understand and generates more compact code(at least on AIX system). So, I'd like to see more activities on mlgtk. The other question is about reference counting. I looked at lablgtk source and saw that it implemented reference counting, but I cound not find any reference counting code in mlgtk. If it is not, is it because the developers decided that it was not necessary or it just wasn't implemented ? Thanks. Notes mail - SONGSU YUN/Fishkill/IBM@IBMUS VM mail - IBMUSM09(yuns) Internet mail - yuns@US.IBM.COM Dept.; 07CA Zip; 27A IMD EastFishkill Tie Line; 533-6582 Ext; 914-894-6582 ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners