From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA07874 for caml-red; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:57:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA11692 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:47:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com (e4.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.104]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f15Hkrv19085; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 18:46:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from northrelay02.pok.ibm.com (northrelay02.pok.ibm.com [9.117.200.22]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA163802; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 12:45:48 -0500 Received: from d27ml101.rchland.ibm.com (d27ml101.rchland.ibm.com [9.5.39.103]) by northrelay02.pok.ibm.com (8.8.8m3/NCO v4.95) with ESMTP id MAA28770; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 12:43:23 -0500 Importance: Normal Subject: OCaml's long range graphical direction? To: caml-list@inria.fr Cc: Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3 (Intl) 21 March 2000 Message-ID: From: "Daniel Ortmann" Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:48:28 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on d27ml101/27/M/IBM(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 02/05/2001 11:48:30 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Xavier, Please speculate on the future development direction of graphical support in OCaml. Do you anticipate both Tk and GTk being supported? Do you anticipate GTk support being ultimately more desirable and supported than Tk? If so, what are some of the reasons? To what degree does threading affect the answer? -- Daniel Ortmann, IBM Circuit Technology, Rochester, MN 55901-7829 ortmann@us.ibm.com / internal 8.553.6795 / external 507.253.6795 ortmann@isl.net home 507.288.7732 "The answers are so simple, and we all know where to look, but it's easier just to avoid the question." -- Kansas