From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA28525; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 19:41:04 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA28871 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 19:41:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (outbound28-2.lax.untd.com [64.136.28.160]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5OHf1EV020665 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 19:41:01 +0200 Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (smtp01.lax.untd.com [10.130.24.121]) by smtpout05.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABAPYER4A65W9H2 for (sender ); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9145 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2004 17:39:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vangogh) (66.52.239.145) by smtp01.lax.untd.com with SMTP; 24 Jun 2004 17:39:40 -0000 From: "Brandon J. Van Every" To: "caml" Subject: [Caml-list] the maddening filter Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:49:39 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal X-ContentStamp: 4:6:1988355492 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: CI84cOLHFqh7Zd2QWkwvEFvwyO3T/pIsPQZphDk9MRho3yxc7L5ACtkHnLP4xgrw X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 40DB122D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.09; brandon:99 seattle:99 avoiding:01 thingy:01 priorities:01 brandon:99 seattle:99 sig:01 algorithm:03 entrepreneur:95 cheers:06 product:92 i'm:07 www:91 i've:09 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Try as I might, I cannot get a message about the Seattle ML SIG to go through. I am avoiding the use of certain words on the presumption that I am filtered because of them. I have two questions: 1) is there any practical way to test the filter's algorithm? 2) can't we have something else, like a "known ok posters" list? I notice that in the time I've been trying to get a legitimate announcement through, we've gotten some nudie enhancement product thingy. I do not like the algorithm's priorities. I feel like I'm spelling out letters to avoid a smart animal hearing them. Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA "The pioneer is the one with the arrows in his back." - anonymous entrepreneur ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners