From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id GAA23945; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 06:36:53 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA25136 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 06:36:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (outbound28-2.lax.untd.com [64.136.28.160]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i7B4aoRM008683 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 06:36:51 +0200 Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (smtp03.lax.untd.com [10.130.24.123]) by smtpout04.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABATVJTLAUABQD2 for (sender ); Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 4484 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2004 04:35:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vangogh) (66.52.229.190) by smtp03.lax.untd.com with SMTP; 11 Aug 2004 04:35:14 -0000 From: "Brandon J. Van Every" To: "caml" Subject: [Caml-list] Who controls INRIA mailserv filters? Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:45:53 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal X-ContentStamp: 4:6:133679205 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: CI84cOLHFqh7Zd2QWkwvEFvwyO3T/pIsFsCrOjjLH8464+ey6Nfr2e0bS5ExTAGt X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4119A262.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; brandon:99 bayesian:01 bayesian:01 stupid:01 posts:01 caml-list:01 crap:01 crap:01 unboxed:01 bigarray:01 ocaml:01 groups:01 overhead:03 group:04 wondering:04 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk I am irritated, yet again, that I cannot get my announcement for ML S*attle to pass the mailserv filters. Who do I e-mail to do something about this? I also want the words "Brand*n" and "S*attle" removed from the bayesian filter. They are an unreasonable detriment to my ongoing organization of OCaml local discussion groups and mailing lists, and frankly I'm suspicious that someone put them there deliberately. Either that or the bayesian filter is stupid enough to assume that any high volume of posts must by needs be filtered. Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com Brand*n Van Every S*attle, WA Praise Be to the caml-list Bayesian filter! It blesseth my postings, it is evil crap! evil crap! Bigarray! Unboxed overhead group! Wondering! chant chant chant... ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners