From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA15678; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:26:55 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA16173 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:26:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (outbound28-2.lax.untd.com [64.136.28.160]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i7C7QqmL000591 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:26:52 +0200 Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (smtp04.lax.untd.com [10.130.24.124]) by smtpout02.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABATYG6TAS5ZPTS for (sender ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:26:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 13467 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2004 07:25:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vangogh) (66.52.229.237) by smtp04.lax.untd.com with SMTP; 12 Aug 2004 07:25:22 -0000 From: "Brandon J. Van Every" To: "caml" Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Who controls INRIA mailserv filters? Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:36:02 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20040811142549.01d03f38@mail.web-ster.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-ContentStamp: 14:7:383377470 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: CI84cOLHFqh7Zd2QWkwvEFvwyO3T/pIsFsCrOjjLH86QvNeMdfgDHb79Vgm64O1h X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 411B1BBC.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; brandon:99 caml-list:01 brandon:99 spelled:99 agr:99 followup:01 posts:01 posts:01 caml-list:01 spelled:99 bayesian:01 crap:01 crap:01 unboxed:01 bigarray:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk don groves wrote: > At 14:22 8/11/2004, don groves wrote: > >At 13:29 8/11/2004, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: > > > >Maybe if you spelled S*attle correctly the filter would pass it. > >Most, if not all, words with embedded non-alpha characters these > >days are ads for V!agr@ or C!@lis so the filter gets trained > on those. > > Nope, that's not it ;) I am unsure of your antecedant, so I'm unsure what you mean by your followup. If you look at the X-Sp*m header of your 2 posts, you will see a list of words. Those with high values like 99's increase the likelihood that your post will be classified as sp*m. That is why I use an asterisk with them. The problem words in your own posts are: brand*n spell*d s*attle agggggr (only 1 g, probably part of vairga (letters transposed to protect us all)) addddds (only 1 d) traff*c Bear in mind that each and every one of my posts carries an automatic strike against me. Even though I'm willing to use Brand*n in my signature, I'm totally unwilling to create a separate e-mail identity just for caml-list. So every one of my posts has 1 correctly spelled occurrance of Brand*n in it. I bet, furthermore, that you will not see the word S*attle (correctly spelled) in the X-sp*m header of this post. This would disprove your claim about * being a red flag for the filter, unless the filter does not in fact report full information about how it makes its decisions. Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com Brand*n Van Every S*attle, WA Praise Be to the caml-list Bayesian filter! It blesseth my postings, it is evil crap! evil crap! Bigarray! Unboxed overhead group! Wondering! chant chant chant... ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners