From: "Brandon J. Van Every" <vanevery@indiegamedesign.com>
To: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:58:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OOEALCJCKEBJBIJHCNJDIEBDHBAB.vanevery@indiegamedesign.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040415173853.GA6463@tallman.kefka.frap.net>
Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>
> Ranting against autoconf is off-topic
Not really, considering the future of OCaml build tools is under
discussion.
> and uninteresting.
To you.
> I support it, and *don't* think it is a good idea
> to create your own from scratch each time.
So this devolves into an aesthetic / woulda coulda shoulda argument.
When the time comes, count me on the side of those who want to see
everything done in OCaml. I'd put up with interim steps to get there,
I'm Python-friendly.
> so let's drop that rant as well, and try to be a bit more
> productive.
Productive would be, you go do your thing, we'll go do ours. Enough
talk. We know where our lines of disagreement are.
Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com
Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA
"We live in a world of very bright people building
crappy software with total shit for tools and process."
- Ed Mckenzie
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.643 / Virus Database: 411 - Release Date: 3/25/2004
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-15 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 147+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-07 18:47 [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code John Goerzen
2004-04-07 20:37 ` Samuel Mimram
2004-04-07 21:05 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2002-01-04 0:43 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-08 0:58 ` Dustin Sallings
2004-04-08 6:24 ` Brian Hurt
2004-04-08 7:47 ` Oleg Trott
2004-04-08 8:04 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2004-04-08 7:52 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2004-04-08 8:15 ` Dustin Sallings
2004-04-08 13:37 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 14:56 ` Markus Mottl
2004-04-08 15:14 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-08 15:26 ` Markus Mottl
2004-04-08 15:39 ` Jon Harrop
2004-04-08 15:58 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 17:59 ` Jean-Marc EBER
2004-04-08 18:20 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-08 18:39 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 19:21 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-08 18:29 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-13 6:15 ` Trevor Andrade
2004-04-13 11:17 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-13 13:16 ` skaller
2004-04-13 14:24 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-13 14:53 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-13 18:07 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI (was: Dynamically evaluating OCaml code) Christophe TROESTLER
2004-04-13 19:30 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-13 19:57 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI Christophe TROESTLER
2004-04-13 20:45 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 0:34 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-14 5:35 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 6:00 ` james woodyatt
2004-04-14 6:21 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 9:17 ` james woodyatt
2004-04-14 6:16 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 7:38 ` [Caml-list] BSD vs. GPL Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 8:32 ` Matt Gushee
2004-04-14 8:48 ` Wolfgang Müller
2004-04-14 8:40 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 17:14 ` David Brown
2004-04-14 18:50 ` [Caml-list] benefit of package management Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-15 6:46 ` [Caml-list] BSD vs. GPL Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 15:05 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-15 0:20 ` skaller
2004-04-15 2:36 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-15 17:48 ` Benjamin Geer
2004-04-14 10:50 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI skaller
2004-04-14 1:04 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-14 2:52 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2004-04-14 5:14 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 6:53 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2004-04-14 6:57 ` Kenneth Knowles
[not found] ` <407D2075.2070104@jollys.org>
2004-04-14 16:14 ` ocamlconf on Cygwin (Re: [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake) Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 7:50 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake Nicolas Cannasse
2004-04-14 11:54 ` skaller
2004-04-14 16:49 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-15 1:05 ` skaller
2004-04-15 6:34 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-15 7:33 ` skaller
2004-04-15 16:00 ` Kenneth Knowles
[not found] ` <1082049025.20677.1250.camel@pelican>
2004-04-15 17:38 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-15 23:58 ` Brandon J. Van Every [this message]
2004-04-16 1:16 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 6:31 ` [Caml-list] build tools - good vs. fast, both cheap Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-16 14:38 ` skaller
2004-04-16 15:16 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-16 16:12 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 16:17 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-16 16:39 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-17 6:01 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2004-04-17 6:25 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-17 9:19 ` Alain.Frisch
2004-04-16 21:53 ` William Lovas
2004-04-17 2:30 ` skaller
2004-04-17 5:47 ` Blair Zajac
2004-04-17 6:28 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 14:52 ` skaller
2004-04-16 16:06 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 18:10 ` skaller
2004-04-16 18:43 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 19:55 ` skaller
2004-04-16 18:46 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-16 18:55 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 20:22 ` skaller
2004-04-16 19:39 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-16 21:00 ` skaller
2004-04-15 9:47 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake Markus Mottl
2004-04-15 16:38 ` skaller
2004-04-16 1:30 ` Richard Cole
2004-04-16 14:11 ` skaller
2004-04-15 1:25 ` skaller
2004-04-14 12:19 ` skaller
2004-04-14 18:21 ` [Caml-list] recompiling bytecode Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 18:54 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-14 20:26 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-14 20:35 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2004-04-15 1:39 ` skaller
2004-04-14 13:03 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-14 12:45 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-13 15:03 ` [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Matt Gushee
2004-04-13 17:24 ` Benjamin Geer
2004-04-09 5:40 ` skaller
2004-04-08 15:30 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 16:08 ` Xavier Leroy
2004-04-08 16:44 ` Markus Mottl
2004-04-08 17:35 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-09 6:41 ` skaller
2004-04-08 19:44 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-09 6:23 ` skaller
2004-04-09 6:33 ` Remi Vanicat
2004-04-09 7:37 ` skaller
2004-04-09 8:17 ` Remi Vanicat
2004-04-09 8:35 ` OT: licences (was Re: [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code) Benjamin Geer
2004-04-10 10:10 ` skaller
2004-04-09 8:36 ` [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Markus Mottl
2004-04-10 9:59 ` skaller
2004-04-09 9:09 ` james woodyatt
2004-04-08 16:44 ` Bruno.Verlyck
2004-04-08 17:55 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-09 13:44 ` Bruno.Verlyck
2004-04-08 15:31 ` Jon Harrop
2004-04-08 19:52 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-25 23:07 ` [Caml-list] Is GCaml Dead Again? Greg K
2004-04-08 15:04 ` [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Fernando Alegre
2004-04-08 15:22 ` Jean-Marc EBER
2004-04-09 6:44 ` Pierre Weis
2004-04-08 15:23 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-08 15:38 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 22:31 ` Markus Mottl
2004-04-08 18:28 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2004-04-08 17:15 ` Brian Hurt
2004-04-08 18:32 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-09 5:04 ` skaller
2004-04-08 17:25 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-08 7:10 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2004-04-08 17:09 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-07 21:32 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-04-07 20:39 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-07 21:47 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-04-07 22:14 ` Benjamin Geer
2004-04-08 7:49 ` skaller
2004-04-08 19:11 ` Christophe TROESTLER
[not found] ` <200404072306.15109.clement.capel@free.fr>
2004-04-07 23:25 ` clement capel
2004-04-13 21:25 ` [Caml-list] eval for OCaml Brock
2004-04-08 0:17 ` [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Jon Harrop
2004-04-08 17:31 ` Walid Taha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OOEALCJCKEBJBIJHCNJDIEBDHBAB.vanevery@indiegamedesign.com \
--to=vanevery@indiegamedesign.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).