From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id BAA05525; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:50:25 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA31483 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:50:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (vlan1-1.bigip2.lax.untd.com [64.136.28.160]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i3FNoMYM002834 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:50:23 +0200 Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (smtp01.lax.untd.com [10.130.24.121]) by smtpout01.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABAH8H72A38BXWJ for (sender ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:50:16 -0700 (PST) Received: (qmail 21974 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2004 23:49:50 -0000 Received: from dsc04-sei-wa-199-182-70-246.rasserver.net (HELO vangogh) (199.182.70.246) by smtp01.lax.untd.com with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 23:49:50 -0000 From: "Brandon J. Van Every" To: Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:58:47 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20040415173853.GA6463@tallman.kefka.frap.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal X-ContentStamp: 10:5:3151858514 X-MAIL-INFO: 1e1154a9c154a97984a9e139c499891de1f91de1a519e1a450e490 X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; brandon:99 caml-list:01 ocamake:01 knowles:99 ranting:01 autoconf:01 shoulda:01 rant:01 brandon:99 seattle:99 crappy:01 2004:99 productive:01 productive:01 ocaml:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > Ranting against autoconf is off-topic Not really, considering the future of OCaml build tools is under discussion. > and uninteresting. To you. > I support it, and *don't* think it is a good idea > to create your own from scratch each time. So this devolves into an aesthetic / woulda coulda shoulda argument. When the time comes, count me on the side of those who want to see everything done in OCaml. I'd put up with interim steps to get there, I'm Python-friendly. > so let's drop that rant as well, and try to be a bit more > productive. Productive would be, you go do your thing, we'll go do ours. Enough talk. We know where our lines of disagreement are. Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA "We live in a world of very bright people building crappy software with total shit for tools and process." - Ed Mckenzie --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.643 / Virus Database: 411 - Release Date: 3/25/2004 ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners