From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA25113; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:59:00 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA24853 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:58:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (outbound28-2.lax.untd.com [64.136.28.160]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i7CBwuRM019166 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:58:57 +0200 Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (smtp02.lax.untd.com [10.130.24.122]) by smtpout04.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABATYY52A3ZCJHA for (sender ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 04:58:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 24953 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2004 11:58:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vangogh) (66.52.236.216) by smtp02.lax.untd.com with SMTP; 12 Aug 2004 11:58:19 -0000 From: "Brandon J. Van Every" To: "caml" Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Who controls INRIA mailserv filters? Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:09:00 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-ContentStamp: 5:2:955698935 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: CI84cOLHFqh7Zd2QWkwvEFvwyO3T/pIsFsCrOjjLH87LDTR7w33j8FtcrlgLtppE X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 411B5B80.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; brandon:99 caml-list:01 brandon:99 restaurants:99 caml-list:01 bayesian:01 crap:01 crap:01 unboxed:01 bigarray:01 overhead:03 group:04 wondering:04 cheers:06 indeed:06 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Brandon J. Van Every > > > Two things are clear here: the filter think that discussions of food > > and restaurants aren't on topic here; moreover, your attempt to > > disguise Yahoo into something else clearly backfired. If you write > > like spammers, you'll be filtered like spammers, that's for sure. > > I did not discuss Yahoo. Ergo, no attempt on my part to > disguise anything. I forgot that I did indeed do that, at 5 in the morning. Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com Brand*n Van Every S*attle, WA Praise Be to the caml-list Bayesian filter! It blesseth my postings, it is evil crap! evil crap! Bigarray! Unboxed overhead group! Wondering! chant chant chant... ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners