From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id IAA28311; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:41:17 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA30056 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:41:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (outbound28-2.lax.untd.com [64.136.28.160]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id i7V6fFYb007447 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:41:15 +0200 Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (smtp04.lax.untd.com [10.130.24.124]) by smtpout02.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABAVJHMCAD5QBM2 for (sender ); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:40:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 8456 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2004 06:39:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vangogh) (66.52.203.39) by smtp04.lax.untd.com with SMTP; 31 Aug 2004 06:39:32 -0000 From: "Brandon J. Van Every" To: "caml" Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Cross-compiling OCaml Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:50:27 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20040831060903.GA16777@pegasos> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal X-ContentStamp: 11:5:1704670421 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: CI84cOLHFqh7Zd2QWkwvEFvwyO3T/pIsFsCrOjjLH873e5AKyZqAb4tooPr6W42X X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41341D8B.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; brandon:99 caml-list:01 sven:01 luther:01 mingw:01 inclined:01 legs:99 caml-list:01 bayesian:01 crap:01 crap:01 unboxed:01 alloc:01 alloc:01 val:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Sven Luther wrote: > > This would indeed be a great great additional functionality. Well, speaking as a Windows-centric guy, I'd rather people just put their time into good Windows support. I realize that the Linux / mingw crowd isn't so inclined towards that. I'm just saying that mainstream Windows developers don't see cross-compilation from Linux as valuable. First class native Windows support is what counts. N.B. I'm not Windows-centric out of any love for Windows or Microsoft. Rather, I'm a game developer. To make money commercially, that's the platform I'm stuck with. For computer games, Mac barely has the legs to bother with, and Linux certainly doesn't. Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com Brand*n Van Every S*attle, WA Praise Be to the caml-list Bayesian filter! It blesseth my postings, it is evil crap! evil crap! Bigarray! Unboxed overhead group! Wondering! chant chant chant... Is my technical content showing? // return an array of 100 packed tuples temps int $[tvar0][2*100]; // what the c function needs value $[tvar1]; // one int value $[tvar2]; // one tuple int $[tvar3] // loop control var oncePre eachPre $[cvar0]=&($[tvar0][0]); eachPost $[lvar0] = alloc(2*100, 0 /*NB: zero-tagged block*/ ); for(int $[tvar3]=0;$[tvar3]<100;$[tvar3]++) { $[tvar2] = alloc_tuple(2); $[tvar1] = Val_int($[cvar0][0+2*$[tvar3]]); Store_field($[tvar2],0,$[tvar1]); $[tvar1] = Val_int($[cvar0][1]); Store_field($[tvar2],1,$[tvar1+2*$[tvar3]]); Array_store($[lvar0],$[tvar3],$[tvar0]); } oncePost ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners