From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id AAA10878; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 00:57:05 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA10829 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 00:57:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (outbound28-2.lax.untd.com [64.136.28.160]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5MMv2EV019702 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 00:57:02 +0200 Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (smtp03.lax.untd.com [10.130.24.123]) by smtpout05.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABAPTQKUA29VWYA for (sender ); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1896 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2004 22:56:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vangogh) (66.52.239.139) by smtp03.lax.untd.com with SMTP; 22 Jun 2004 22:56:09 -0000 From: "Brandon J. Van Every" To: "caml" Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Interface between Ocaml and C++ Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:06:07 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 In-Reply-To: <200406222144.48707.exa@kablonet.com.tr> Importance: Normal X-ContentStamp: 6:3:3873751386 X-MAIL-INFO: 25e3779b7e779b2a6a9bbe9f939abbabbedfabbe3a8ebedbdaa3ee X-UNTD-OriginStamp: CI84cOLHFqh7Zd2QWkwvEFvwyO3T/pIsPQZphDk9MRgsmLmkaX84gZ8xFrcJbGyT X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 40D8B93E.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; brandon:99 caml-list:01 eray:01 ozkural:01 stdlib:01 brandon:99 seattle:99 2004:99 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 wrote:03 interface:03 stl:03 certified:94 cheers:06 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Eray Ozkural wrote: > > Maybe SWIG's approach is a good middleground then? But it > makes me wonder, why > should I want to use C++ stdlib if I have ocaml? >:-) Indeed, the whole reason I went looking for HLLs is my unwillingness to deal with C++ STL. I find myself asking, "When do I get off this C++ train wreck?" It's an evolutionary dead end. Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA 20% of the world is real. 80% is gobbledygook we make up inside our own heads. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.708 / Virus Database: 464 - Release Date: 6/18/2004 ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners