From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA19857; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:13:13 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA20765 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:13:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (outbound28-2.lax.untd.com [64.136.28.160]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i7C9DAmL012843 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:13:11 +0200 Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (smtp04.lax.untd.com [10.130.24.124]) by smtpout04.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABATYPE3AA6ZBF2 for (sender ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 409 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2004 09:12:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vangogh) (66.52.229.237) by smtp04.lax.untd.com with SMTP; 12 Aug 2004 09:12:15 -0000 From: "Brandon J. Van Every" To: "caml" Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Who controls INRIA mailserv filters? Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:22:56 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-ContentStamp: 11:5:1820871842 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: CI84cOLHFqh7Zd2QWkwvEFvwyO3T/pIsFsCrOjjLH848Qs0RM1Mbpm40UP5L9njB X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 411B34A6.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; brandon:99 caml-list:01 crap:01 seattle:99 functors:01 brandon:99 seattle:99 alloc:01 alloc:01 val:01 val:01 compiler:01 caml:01 caml:01 int:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Diego Olivier > > When I recommend you to make your post more technical it means : > > - adding blocks of Caml code in your signature instead of the current > one that just says the Caml filter is a crap (exercice : make a Caml > program that chooses randomly 20 lines of code in the Caml compiler > and adds them to your signature) Not a bad idea, and less audacious than using Xavier as my trojan. :-) Testfiring now. > - using more specifically Caml oriented words - something like "In the > next Seattle meeting we will discuss how inclusion polymorphism / > functors < add technical content here > can be applied to 3D rendering > for real-time games < add technical content here >" I'm not interested in watering down the brevity and clarity of the announcement. We meet *in person* to discuss such things. Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA // return an array of 100 packed tuples temps int $[tvar0][2*100]; // what the c function needs value $[tvar1]; // one int value $[tvar2]; // one tuple int $[tvar3] // loop control var oncePre eachPre $[cvar0]=&($[tvar0][0]); eachPost $[lvar0] = alloc(2*100, 0 /*NB: zero-tagged block*/ ); for(int $[tvar3]=0;$[tvar3]<100;$[tvar3]++) { $[tvar2] = alloc_tuple(2); $[tvar1] = Val_int($[cvar0][0+2*$[tvar3]]); Store_field($[tvar2],0,$[tvar1]); $[tvar1] = Val_int($[cvar0][1]); Store_field($[tvar2],1,$[tvar1+2*$[tvar3]]); Array_store($[lvar0],$[tvar3],$[tvar0]); } oncePost ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners