From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA30217; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:08:50 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA30569 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:08:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (outbound28-2.lax.untd.com [64.136.28.160]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i6SK8lEV020955 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:08:48 +0200 Received: from outbound28-2.lax.untd.com (smtp04.lax.untd.com [10.130.24.124]) by smtpout03.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABASSB8JAFG938S for (sender ); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:08:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 12184 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2004 20:08:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vangogh) (66.42.37.194) by smtp04.lax.untd.com with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 20:08:06 -0000 From: "Brandon J. Van Every" To: "caml" Subject: RE: [Caml-list] looping recursion Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:18:34 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <200407282040.40600.jon@jdh30.plus.com> X-ContentStamp: 6:3:3301875426 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: CI84cOLHFqh7Zd2QWkwvEFvwyO3T/pIsFsCrOjjLH84aB4tXLUOPbKY6MINRYVhH X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 410807CF.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; brandon:99 caml-list:01 recursion:01 seattle:99 caml-list:01 bayesian:01 crap:01 crap:01 unboxed:01 bigarray:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 overhead:03 wrote:03 group:04 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Jon Harrop wrote: > > No! That points to a severe deficiency in your programming > style. OCaml has > been developed and used by a great many very clever people, > and me. If you're > doing things like that then you should immediately stop and > think what you might be doing wrong. Although you might have a point, your need to bluster lends no weight. > Perhaps you picked the bad style up at > a Seattle OCaml user group meeting? Did you learn to debate from a politician, in soundbytes? Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com Brand*n Van Every S*attle, WA Praise Be to the caml-list Bayesian filter! It blesseth my postings, it is evil crap! evil crap! Bigarray! Unboxed! Overhead! Wondering! chant chant chant... ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners