From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA00994; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:19:54 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA00964 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:19:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA30213 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:13:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g16ADWn23323 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:13:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from ibm3.cicrp.jussieu.fr (ibm3.cicrp.jussieu.fr [134.157.15.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.12.1/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id g16ADSYD094727 ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:13:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from ibm1.cicrp.jussieu.fr (ibm1.cicrp.jussieu.fr [134.157.15.1]) by ibm3.cicrp.jussieu.fr (8.8.8/jtpda/mob-V8) with ESMTP id LAA31782 ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:14:38 +0100 Received: from localhost (fernande@localhost) by ibm1.cicrp.jussieu.fr (8.8.8/jtpda/mob-v8) with SMTP id LAA126358 ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:08:42 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:08:42 +0100 (NFT) From: Diego olivier FERNANDEZ PONS To: Francisco Valverde-Albacete cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Syntax In-Reply-To: <3C60E263.D2E35B3A@tsc.uc3m.es> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Francisco Valverde-Albacete wrote:=20 > Bonjour, >=20 > Je serais aussi extr=EAmement interess=E9 par une telle librairie.=20 > Malheureusement, je crois que je raterais tous les details si vous > r=E9pondiez en fran=E7ais. Quand vous ferez publiques ces informations, > pouvez-vous le faire en Anglais, svp ? >=20 > Merci d'avance >=20 > Francisco J. Valverde > (J'ai op=E9r=E9 quelques retouches)=20 I'm awfully sorry for posting in french, I only do because of my poor english... and usually people do not care much about what I may want to say. Are there many persons working on computational linguistics in this list ? I said that most of computational linguistics were made in Prolog and Lisp because of the handly way you can use grammars in Prolog and the list facilities in Lisp. Actually, I believe Caml could be an excellent substitute for this two languages in computational linguistics since it not has only list and symbolic facilities but a lot of other useful features and librairies. I suppose Gerard Huet must agree, otherwise would not be developing in Caml, would he ?=20 It could be very interesting to know which languages you have been working with, which features you find the most important and would like to see in a linguistic library. =09Diego Olivier ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr