From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA17606; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:47:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA16958 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:47:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i76FlNRM000400 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:47:23 +0200 Received: from ibm3.cicrp.jussieu.fr (ibm3.cicrp.jussieu.fr [134.157.15.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.12.11/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id i76Fjqch028246 ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:45:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 165 Received: from ibm1.cicrp.jussieu.fr (ibm1.cicrp.jussieu.fr [134.157.15.1]) by ibm3.cicrp.jussieu.fr (8.8.8/jtpda/mob-V8) with ESMTP id RAA69674 ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:43:54 +0200 Received: from localhost (fernande@localhost) by ibm1.cicrp.jussieu.fr (8.8.8/jtpda/mob-v8) with ESMTP id RAA495710 ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:43:22 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: ibm1.cicrp.jussieu.fr: fernande owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:43:21 +0200 (DST) From: Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons X-X-Sender: fernande@ibm1 To: John Prevost cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Peut on unifier foncteurs et objets ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4113A80B.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 4113A7B0.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; pons:01 pons:01 etu:99 caml-list:01 foncteurs:01 functor:01 scare:01 functors:01 functors:01 fernandez:01 fernandez:01 olivier:02 olivier:02 objects:02 objects:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Bonjour, > What I *would* like to see is a bit better support when the two > things are used together. Yes, that was the point. The 'unification' question was mostly pure rhethoric. My actual problem is that I have many parallel functor/object in my code because I some times need the first, some times the later - and I never know from the beginning which one I finally be using. > It is this sort of difficulty that can scare a user of objects away > from using functors, even when functors do suit their needs > admirably. I am usually scared of using _objects_ even if _objects_ do suit my needs admirably. Diego Olivier ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners