From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA18745; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:31:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA18073 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:31:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7C8VGmL007948 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:31:16 +0200 Received: from ibm3.cicrp.jussieu.fr (ibm3.cicrp.jussieu.fr [134.157.15.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.12.11/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id i7C8V8Xx025032 ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:31:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 167 Received: from ibm1.cicrp.jussieu.fr (ibm1.cicrp.jussieu.fr [134.157.15.1]) by ibm3.cicrp.jussieu.fr (8.8.8/jtpda/mob-V8) with ESMTP id KAA54240 ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:29:10 +0200 Received: from localhost (fernande@localhost) by ibm1.cicrp.jussieu.fr (8.8.8/jtpda/mob-v8) with ESMTP id KAA676080 ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:28:48 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: ibm1.cicrp.jussieu.fr: fernande owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:28:47 +0200 (DST) From: Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons X-X-Sender: fernande@ibm1 To: "Brandon J. Van Every" cc: caml Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Who controls INRIA mailserv filters? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 411B2AD4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 411B2ACC.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; pons:01 pons:01 etu:99 caml-list:01 bayesian:01 bayesian:01 crap:01 seattle:99 functors:01 compiler:01 fernandez:01 fernandez:01 caml:01 caml:01 olivier:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Bonjour, > What's getting filtered are announces of ML S*attle, which is > legitimate traffic [...] > Also do you really believe this bayesian filter retrains if I > exercise "good behavior?" I don't; I think it's dumb as bricks. [...] > You may not like business or organizational issues, or the kinds of > theatrics they can precipitate, but that's the growing pains of any > language The point is not what I (or whoever) think but what the bayesian filter does or does not filter. It is _just_ a bayesian filter, not a semantic based natural language parser. When I recommend you to make your post more technical it means : - adding blocks of Caml code in your signature instead of the current one that just says the Caml filter is a crap (exercice : make a Caml program that chooses randomly 20 lines of code in the Caml compiler and adds them to your signature) - using more specifically Caml oriented words - something like "In the next Seattle meeting we will discuss how inclusion polymorphism / functors < add technical content here > can be applied to 3D rendering for real-time games < add technical content here >" Diego Olivier ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners