Re: [Caml-list] FORT (Framework for Ocaml Regression Testing)

[Patrick M Doane <patrick@watson.org>]

Hi Dave,

I think we may have a different expectation for the terminology.  The
JUnit web page describes it is as a "regression testing framework".  Also,
my initial uses of FORT have been just for unit testing, so I think it
should grow to handle that area of testing well. 

>From a high-level perspective, these systems are more or less the same.
Not having used JUnit, there are probably several low-level primitives
that could be useful to add to FORT.

So, give it a try, and let me know what aspects of JUnit we need to try to
pull in!

Patrick Doane

On Tue, 1 May 2001, Dave Mason wrote:

> Looks good!
> 
> I realize that this is regression testing, which is important, but I
> have used junit quite a lot with Java (increasingly wishing I was
> using ocaml), and I think, in general, that junit-style testing is
> more useful than regression testing.  So patrick, or someone else,
> might want to look at www.junit.org.
> 
> Unless I missed someone announcing an ocunit...
> 
> ../Dave
> 

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr.  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr