From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA29114; Tue, 1 May 2001 17:04:46 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA29137 for ; Tue, 1 May 2001 17:04:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f41F4g503175 for ; Tue, 1 May 2001 17:04:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (patrick@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f41F4ZT48195; Tue, 1 May 2001 11:04:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from patrick@watson.org) Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 11:04:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Patrick M Doane To: Dave Mason cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] FORT (Framework for Ocaml Regression Testing) In-Reply-To: <200105011029.GAA02897@sarg.Ryerson.CA> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi Dave, I think we may have a different expectation for the terminology. The JUnit web page describes it is as a "regression testing framework". Also, my initial uses of FORT have been just for unit testing, so I think it should grow to handle that area of testing well. >>From a high-level perspective, these systems are more or less the same. Not having used JUnit, there are probably several low-level primitives that could be useful to add to FORT. So, give it a try, and let me know what aspects of JUnit we need to try to pull in! Patrick Doane On Tue, 1 May 2001, Dave Mason wrote: > Looks good! > > I realize that this is regression testing, which is important, but I > have used junit quite a lot with Java (increasingly wishing I was > using ocaml), and I think, in general, that junit-style testing is > more useful than regression testing. So patrick, or someone else, > might want to look at www.junit.org. > > Unless I missed someone announcing an ocunit... > > ../Dave > ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr