From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA06708; Thu, 10 May 2001 17:07:12 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA06704 for ; Thu, 10 May 2001 17:07:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f4AF77n28629; Thu, 10 May 2001 17:07:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (patrick@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f4AF6x204996; Thu, 10 May 2001 11:06:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from patrick@watson.org) Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 11:06:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Patrick M Doane To: Fabrice Le Fessant cc: John Max Skaller , Markus Mottl , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CDK binary release In-Reply-To: <15098.23852.403551.65183@cremant.inria.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Thu, 10 May 2001, Fabrice Le Fessant wrote: > The CDK documentation tool has still many problems, but it is > currently the only tool which produces man pages for Ocaml modules and > functions. Out of curiosity, who wants to be reading Ocaml documentation through man pages? I would think HTML and texinfo would both be nicer formats to work with. Is there some advantage that I'm missing? Patrick ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr