From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA30299 for caml-red; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 21:41:29 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA22038 for <weis@pauillac.inria.fr>; Sat, 21 Oct 2000 20:30:11 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from shell16.ba.best.com (shell16.ba.best.com [206.184.139.148])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e9LIU9r13052;
	Sat, 21 Oct 2000 20:30:10 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from localhost (def6@localhost)
	by shell16.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.sh) with ESMTP id LAA22942;
	Sat, 21 Oct 2000 11:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: shell16.ba.best.com: def6 owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 11:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
X-Sender: def6@shell16.ba.best.com
To: Vitaly Lugovsky <vsl@ontil.ihep.su>
cc: Pierre Weis <Pierre.Weis@inria.fr>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: circular types?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010211621080.30907-100000@ontil.ihep.su>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010211126030.20909-100000@shell16.ba.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr


> > class foo;
> > class bar;
> > class foo { bar *Bar; };
> > // ...lots of stuff...
> > class bar { foo *Foo; };
>  It's just a C++ way. Sucks. "and" construction is much more informative.

Oh, and here I thought it was a flexible and yet still typesafe
programming construct useful for decoupling large projects.  I
obviously have a lot of learning to do.

:)

Chris