From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA01438; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 21:12:14 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA01110 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 21:12:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from arda.pair.com (arda.pair.com [209.68.1.133]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with SMTP id fA7KCC123521 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 21:12:12 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 36507 invoked by uid 3022); 7 Nov 2001 20:12:11 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Nov 2001 20:12:11 -0000 Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:12:11 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hecker X-Sender: To: Subject: [Caml-list] debugger backtracking/checkpoints In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > but disagree with the claim itself. Ocaml's debugger is in one respect > extremely advanced: it is a reversible debugger, which puts it way ahead > of most languages' debuggers, imperative or not. It is in one other Since the debugger doesn't work on msvc builds, I haven't used it much, but do people find the backtracking thing useful in everyday debugging? Chris ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr