From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA16940; Thu, 1 May 2003 20:38:26 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA16211 for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 20:38:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.eecs.harvard.edu (bowser.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.24]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h41IcOT23929 for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 20:38:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by mail.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 32018) id 50D3354C4A6; Thu, 1 May 2003 14:38:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5A754C4A2 for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 14:38:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 14:38:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Lex Stein To: Ocaml Mailing List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] comparison with C performance In-Reply-To: <1051811713.25152.1.camel@car.pixar.com> Message-ID: References: <1051811713.25152.1.camel@car.pixar.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam: no; 0.00; stein:01 caml-list:01 slower:01 egan:01 caddr:02 comparison:02 overhead:03 eecs:03 lex:04 harvard:09 nfs:11 miles:11 performance:17 thanks:21 answer:21 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk My short answer is: No. Thanks Lex > Wouldn't you expect any userspace nfs server to be much slower than the > kernel-based implementation due to the overhead of all the extra > context-switching? > > -- > Miles Egan > ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners