From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA02155; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:47:38 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA01414 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:47:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from master.tardis.ed.ac.uk (master.tardis.ed.ac.uk [193.62.81.6]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g2EEla506334 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:47:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from davros.tardis.ed.ac.uk (davros.tardis.ed.ac.uk [193.62.81.4]) by master.tardis.ed.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E6E2F84C for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:47:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: by davros.tardis.ed.ac.uk (Postfix, from userid 267) id 5284CC15A; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:47:35 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:47:34 +0000 (GMT) From: Andrew Birkett To: Subject: [Caml-list] Profiling Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, Is there a technical reason why you can't profile a bytecode ocaml program, or is it just something which has never been written? Since this is my first post to the list, I'd just like to say how much I like the ocaml language, particularly the speed of the compiler. It makes programming fun again! Andrew - www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~adb - ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners