From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: weis
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA19005 for caml-redistribution; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:47:06 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA10134 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:31:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from cs.Technion.AC.IL (csa.cs.technion.ac.il [132.68.32.1])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA29193;
	Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:31:48 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from localhost (roy@localhost)
	by cs.Technion.AC.IL (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id JAA14056;
	Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:33:12 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:33:12 +0200 (IST)
From: Friedman Roy <roy@cs.technion.ac.il>
To: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
cc: Manuel Fahndrich <maf@microsoft.com>,
        "'caml-list@inria.fr'" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: file permission integer
In-Reply-To: <19990329181056.50745@pauillac.inria.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95-heb-2.07.990330092719.13509D-100000@csa.cs.technion.ac.il>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: weis

The only caveat is that in Unix this also sets the user/group/other
permissions, and the equivalent in NT involves writing a C function that
sets the ACL attributes for the file.

Roy

On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Xavier Leroy wrote:

> > The OCAML core contains a function
> > 	open_out_gen : open_flag list -> int -> string -> out_channel
> > where the integer corresponds to the file permissions set when a new file is
> > created. How is this integer interpreted? Does it vary from platform to
> > platform? (Unix vs Windows).
> > If this information is described in the doc, I apologize, but I couldn't
> > find it.
> 
> No need to apologize, this is indeed not documented (oops!).
> 
> The integer argument to open_*_gen follows the Unix semantics,
> i.e. 0oABC, where A are the user permissions, B the group permissions,
> C the permissions for others.  A, B, C are single octal digits
> obtained by or-ing individual permission bits: 1 for execute permission,
> 2 for write permission, and 4 for read permission.
> 
> Under Windows, only the "write permission" bit of the "user
> permission" digit is consulted, and determines if the file is created
> read-write or read-only.  (The other permission bits don't have any
> equivalent in Win32, at least on a FAT file system.)
> 
> So, if you pass the correct permissions for Unix, your code should
> work just fine under Windows.
> 
> In Caml Light, we used to have symbolic names for the various
> permission bits.  I removed them in OCaml after realizing that the
> Unix bit-patterns work just fine in Windows as well.  However, the
> Unix encoding is a bit cryptic, so maybe those symbolic names were a
> good idea after all.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> - Xavier Leroy
> 
>