From: David Monniaux <David.Monniaux@ens.fr>
To: Alain Frisch <frisch@clipper.ens.fr>
Cc: Liste CAML <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: Ocaml Machine (was Re: speed versus C)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 17:32:35 +0200 (MET DST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.03.9910121731350.313-100000@basilic.ens.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.04.9910121630590.6673-100000@clipper>
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Alain Frisch wrote:
> Yes, I was thinking about modifying an existing chip. For instance, adding
> a tag bit to every machine word should not be so difficult.
This is so true that the Sparc architecture already supports tagged
arithmetic (with two bits of tag per word, if I remember well).
---
David Monniaux Tel: +33 1 44 32 20 66 Fax: +33 1 44 32 20 80
Laboratoire d'informatique de l'École Normale Supérieure,
45 rue d'Ulm - 75230 PARIS cedex 5 - FRANCE
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-10-13 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-10-03 21:35 speed versus C Jan Brosius
1999-10-04 21:59 ` skaller
1999-10-05 23:22 ` chet
1999-10-06 10:22 ` skaller
1999-10-05 20:20 ` Gerd Stolpmann
1999-10-06 15:21 ` William Chesters
1999-10-06 22:49 ` Gerd Stolpmann
1999-10-07 10:26 ` Michel Quercia
1999-10-07 10:46 ` William Chesters
1999-10-07 15:48 ` Pierre Weis
1999-10-07 19:21 ` Gerd Stolpmann
1999-10-08 0:26 ` William Chesters
1999-10-10 16:27 ` Gerd Stolpmann
1999-10-10 20:48 ` William Chesters
1999-10-10 23:54 ` Alain Frisch
1999-10-11 17:58 ` William Chesters
1999-10-12 14:36 ` Ocaml Machine (was Re: speed versus C) Alain Frisch
1999-10-12 15:32 ` David Monniaux [this message]
1999-10-12 15:42 ` Alain Frisch
1999-10-11 19:32 ` speed versus C John Prevost
1999-10-11 20:50 ` Gerd Stolpmann
1999-10-12 20:07 ` skaller
1999-10-08 9:56 ` Pierre Weis
1999-10-07 15:25 ` Markus Mottl
1999-10-07 6:56 ` skaller
1999-10-07 12:37 ` Xavier Urbain
1999-10-07 22:18 ` Gerd Stolpmann
1999-10-08 19:15 ` skaller
1999-10-08 13:40 ` Anton Moscal
1999-10-06 7:58 ` Reply to: " Jens Olsson
1999-10-13 13:44 OCaml machine (was: Re: speed versus C) Juergen Pfitzenmaier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.03.9910121731350.313-100000@basilic.ens.fr \
--to=david.monniaux@ens.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=frisch@clipper.ens.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).