From: Alain Frisch <frisch@clipper.ens.fr>
To: John Max Skaller <skaller@ozemail.com.au>
Cc: OCAML <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: JIT-compilation for OCaml?
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:01:05 +0100 (MET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.04.10101111050080.18041-100000@clipper.ens.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A5D5A14.8EC2F7AB@ozemail.com.au>
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, John Max Skaller wrote:
> > This view seems extreme to me. Certainly the Java type system has faults --
> > lack of generics being one, lack of enumerated types another, and various
> > other points as well. But surely Unicode is a useful de facto standard?
>
> No. Unicode was abandoned years ago: there is an 'offical'
> ISO Standard: ISO-10646. There are 2^31 code points, unlike
> Unicode's 2^16, which is already barely adequate. ISO C and ISO C++
> support ISO-10646. Linux runs ISO-10646 (via UTF-8).
What are you calling 'Unicode' ? For me it is the 'Unicode standard'
from the 'Unicode consortium' (http://www.unicode.org/), and it doesn't
seem like it was abandoned. Actually, it is in sync with ISO/IEC 10646
as for the character set.
See for instance:
http://www.unicode.org/unicode/faq/unicode_iso.html
--
Alain Frisch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-11 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-09 17:18 Dave Berry
2001-01-11 7:00 ` John Max Skaller
2001-01-11 10:01 ` Alain Frisch [this message]
2001-01-12 7:55 ` John Max Skaller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-11 12:45 Dave Berry
2001-01-12 8:23 ` John Max Skaller
2001-01-09 17:09 Dave Berry
2001-01-11 6:38 ` John Max Skaller
2001-01-03 15:24 Jerry Jackson
2001-01-04 14:12 ` Alan Schmitt
2001-01-02 16:07 Markus Mottl
2001-01-02 18:16 ` Mattias Waldau
2001-01-02 19:30 ` Markus Mottl
2001-01-03 12:15 ` Alain Frisch
2001-01-04 8:37 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2001-01-04 9:04 ` Alain Frisch
2001-01-03 13:23 ` Mattias Waldau
2001-01-03 14:25 ` Markus Mottl
2001-01-03 14:40 ` STARYNKEVITCH Basile
2001-01-03 15:51 ` John Max Skaller
2001-01-03 17:50 ` Markus Mottl
2001-01-05 0:30 ` Michael Hicks
2001-01-08 9:59 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-01-09 6:40 ` John Max Skaller
2001-01-03 17:49 ` Joseph R. Kiniry
2001-01-03 18:19 ` Markus Mottl
2001-01-03 18:38 ` Joseph R. Kiniry
2001-01-03 18:58 ` Markus Mottl
2001-01-03 19:06 ` Joseph R. Kiniry
2001-01-04 22:32 ` Jonathan Coupe
2001-01-07 0:16 ` Chris Hecker
2001-01-05 12:52 ` Sven LUTHER
2001-01-05 20:08 ` Joseph R. Kiniry
2001-01-09 7:14 ` John Max Skaller
2001-01-09 6:50 ` John Max Skaller
2001-01-05 12:39 ` Sven LUTHER
2001-01-05 5:48 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.04.10101111050080.18041-100000@clipper.ens.fr \
--to=frisch@clipper.ens.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=skaller@ozemail.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).